Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Representative Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California, recently made bold claims about President Donald Trump’s tenure regarding aviation safety. He asserted that no president has overseen more plane crashes in their first month in office than Trump. However, an analysis of data from the Department of Transportation reveals that the figures contradict Swalwell’s assertions, indicating a higher number of crashes during President Joe Biden’s initial weeks.
On February 17, Swalwell posted on the social media platform X, stating that Trump had presided over more plane crashes during his first month in office than any other president. His statement quickly gained traction, amassing over 7 million views, suggesting significant public interest in the topic.
According to data provided by a senior official within the Biden administration, there were 55 recorded aviation accidents in the United States from January 21, 2021, Biden’s inauguration date, until February 17, 2021. In comparison, the same time frame during Trump’s presidency saw only 35 aviation accidents.
The contrast is even starker on a global scale, with a total of 91 aviation accidents worldwide reported during Biden’s first few weeks in office, versus 50 during the initial weeks of Trump’s presidency.
Swalwell’s comments were made in the context of a small plane crash in Georgia that resulted in two fatalities. Criticizing Swalwell’s remarks, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung stated that Swalwell is a habitual liar and has continued to embarrass himself publicly due to what Cheung termed as a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He emphasized that Swalwell’s misrepresentations demonstrate a clear disconnect from the truth.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Swalwell clarified that he was specifically referring to commercial airliner crashes. His initial post mentioned “planes” generically, which raised questions about his accuracy. According to Swalwell, there were two crashes involving U.S. commercial airliners that resulted in serious injuries or fatalities during Trump’s first month. He challenged his critics to provide examples of any president with a worse record during their inaugural month.
In recent weeks, several Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have attributed high-profile crashes to Trump’s administration. Schumer hinted that budget cuts to the Federal Aviation Administration may have played a role in a notable incident involving an upside-down Delta plane in Toronto, which caused severe injuries but no casualties.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt countered this narrative, indicating that the crash occurred while the plane was in Canadian airspace, under the jurisdiction of Canadian air traffic controllers. She also addressed claims regarding Trump’s removal of FAA officials, asserting that no controllers had been dismissed under the current administration.
Leavitt emphasized that Secretary Duffy’s focus has been on strengthening the FAA by attracting the most qualified air traffic controllers. She argued that ongoing upgrades and staffing strategies within the agency are critical to enhancing aviation safety.
The back-and-forth between Democratic figures and the White House emphasizes the politicization of aviation safety narratives. With the stakes so high when human lives are involved, accuracy in public discourse becomes paramount. Lawmakers have a responsibility to deliver truthful and substantiated claims, especially when discussing sensitive matters such as aviation safety.
As this conversation unfolds, it is clear that the data will play a crucial role. The contrasting numbers between Biden and Trump’s initial weeks establish an important backdrop against which future discussions regarding aviation accountability can happen.
The dialogue surrounding aviation safety and presidential accountability highlights the need for political leaders to prioritize factual claims over sensational narratives. The public, increasingly aware of the implications of such statements, deserves clarity and honesty from elected officials. As the debate continues, it remains vital for representatives to ground their assertions in verified data to uphold their integrity and the public’s trust.
Report contributed by Gabriel Hays from Fox News Digital