Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Denise Richards’ estranged husband Aaron Phypers is embroiled in a contentious divorce that has attracted significant media attention, particularly with the involvement of notable figures like Charlie Sheen and Brandi Glanville. Phypers has named both as potential witnesses in court documents recently acquired by sources.
These court documents were filed on September 29, ahead of scheduled hearings set to take place from October 6 to October 8. In this filing, Phypers’ legal team outlines that both Sheen, who was previously married to Richards, and Glanville, who appeared alongside Richards on the reality television series “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills,” might provide testimony related to allegations of Richards’ alleged dishonesty and struggles with substance abuse.
The divorce saga escalated when Phypers filed for separation from Richards in June, marking the end of their seven-year marriage. The couple has faced a series of accusations against each other, painting a portrait of a tumultuous relationship. In July, Richards secured a temporary restraining order against Phypers following allegations of domestic violence.
During the same period, Phypers accused Richards of being addicted to Vicodin, a claim highlighted in a letter he sent to friends and family. He further alleged infidelity and claimed that Richards physically assaulted him. Both parties have publicly denied the allegations leveled against each other.
Following the formal witness roster submitted by Phypers, Richards responded with an objection on September 30. This objection challenges the relevance of the proposed witnesses, including Sheen and Glanville. The legal documents assert that these individuals lack direct knowledge of any abusive behavior that may have occurred.
Richards’ father, Irv Richards, has also been included in Phypers’ witness list, with his testimony expected to focus on communications regarding the case and allegations related to asset disposal violations. Furthermore, Richards herself is to be asked about what Phypers describes as “false accusations” against him as well as claims of violent behavior.
Phypers’ witness list comprises not only immediate family members but also individuals who could corroborate his assertions about Richards’ alleged drug use and other behaviors during their marriage.
Legal experts have scrutinized Phypers’ decision to summon Sheen and Glanville, with family law attorney Patrick Baghdaserians commenting that the scope of the proposed testimonies appears irrelevant. He argued that bringing Sheen and Glanville into the proceedings seems more aimed at intimidating Richards rather than being focused on the actual issues of domestic violence.
Baghdaserians emphasized that the nature of domestic abuse cases primarily relies on admissible evidence and that historical character references often do not hold significant weight in legal contexts. He expressed skepticism about whether the court would permit either Sheen or Glanville to testify under these circumstances.
Supporting this perspective, Holly Davis, another family law attorney, elaborated that without a direct connection between the testimonies and the allegations of abuse, the testimonies may be seen as irrelevant and an improper use of courtroom resources.
Sheen and Richards were married from 2002 until their divorce in 2006, a period marked by significant personal challenges. Richards cited Sheen’s struggles with addiction as a major factor leading to their marital breakdown. The couple shares two daughters, Sami, now 21, and Lola, now 20, and despite their turbulent history, have managed to maintain an amicable relationship since their divorce.
Sheen, who has publicly shared his own battles with substance abuse, has never implicated Richards in any of his past issues. In recent years, the former couple has shown signs of a restored communication, as noted during a 2023 interview where Sheen described their relationship as friendly.
The dynamics between Brandi Glanville and Denise Richards are notably complex. Their history on “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” has been colored with tensions, particularly after allegations of infidelity emerged while Richards was married to Phypers.
Glanville has made public statements suggesting an understanding between herself and Richards regarding relationship boundaries, which Richards has consistently denied. In previous interactions on social media, Richards has stressed her commitment to monogamy and refuted claims of an open marriage.
The presence of both Charlie Sheen and Brandi Glanville as potential witnesses highlights the sensational elements often associated with celebrity divorces. As the court dates approach, it remains to be seen how this will unfold. Legal experts indicate that unless tangible connections between witnesses and the claims are made, the court may not allow this testimony to proceed.
Family law attorneys caution that all parties involved might benefit from reaching an amicable settlement, as prolonged litigation can drain resources and exacerbate tensions. Given the public nature of the allegations and the fame of those involved, this case may very well serve as a high-profile illustration of the challenges faced during divorce as well as the impact of personal behavior on legal proceedings.