Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A recent article in Politico raises intriguing questions about President Donald Trump’s use of what some describe as messianic rhetoric. The writer, Michael Kruse, suggests that Trump may perceive himself in divine terms, leading to significant implications for his political narrative.
Kruse’s analysis highlights a notable shift in Trump’s rhetoric. He notes that Trump’s perspective has transitioned from a nihilistic view to one imbued with a sense of divine purpose. In essence, Trump appears to have moved from thinking that events are inconsequential to believing that they carry profound significance.
One striking instance cited in the article involves Trump’s response following an assassination attempt on July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania. After this event, he began invoking God in a manner that suggests he views himself as having a divine mission.
During his victory speech at Mar-a-Lago in November, Trump declared, “God spared my life for a reason.” Earlier, during his inauguration speech at the Capitol in January, he stated that he “was saved by God to make America great again.” Such affirmations reveal a spiritual framing that aligns with the expectations of his religious supporters.
Kruse also points out that a variety of religious leaders have previously portrayed Trump as a chosen figure or even a savior. They have used terms like ‘anointed’ and ‘the second coming’ to describe him. Now, it appears that Trump is internalizing this rhetoric. He is not merely the object of these sentiments; he appears to be adopting them himself.
Throughout the piece, Kruse poses a provocative question: “Does Trump actually think he’s God?” While he acknowledges that Trump likely does not regard himself as God, he raises the possibility that Trump views himself as God-like, divinely sanctioned, or even as possessing a sacred purpose.
Further deepening this reflection, Kruse quotes Alan Marcus, a former Trump consultant, who surmised that Trump might prefer to believe he was saved by a divine force rather than attributing his survival to chance. This perspective suggests a desire to see his life and career as part of a grander narrative.
Adding to this discourse, Marie Griffith, director at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics, remarked that Trump’s rhetoric provides insight into his self-perception as a “chosen one.” She posits that Trump’s opportunism might be intertwined with a genuine belief in his divine election.
Moreover, Griffith highlights that the aftermath of the assassination attempt may have contributed to Trump’s increasing assertions of divine favor, indicating that he might have been unsettled by the event and felt an obligation to justify his survival through the language of faith.
Stephen Mansfield, author of “Choosing Donald Trump: God, Anger, Hope, and Why Christian Conservatives Supported Him,” also shared his viewpoint. He believes that Trump positions himself as a tool of God, which aligns neatly with the themes of divine mission present in his recent statements.
In contrast, historical and religious scholar Molly Worthen presents a critical perspective. She describes Trump as a nihilist whose primary source of meaning derives from personal power. Worthen suggests that this desire for dominance aligns with a messianic complex, indicating a possible conflation of power and divinity in Trump’s worldview.
Worthen also emphasizes that Trump’s evolving rhetoric is not a mere departure from his past but rather a culmination of established patterns. This continuous evolution appears to develop concurrently with his political strategy.
Moreover, Kruse references a meme that Trump shared on his TruthSocial account that depicts him walking down a dark street, accompanied by the phrase, “He’s on a mission from God, nothing can stop what is coming.” The implications of this imagery resonate strongly with his supporters, reinforcing the idea of Trump as an agent of divine will.
In response to inquiries about the president’s beliefs, White House communications director Steven Cheung articulated a broader interpretation of faith. He asserted that all individuals have missions from God, with Trump’s being to lead the country and foster global peace. This response underscores the complexities surrounding Trump’s self-portrayal and public perception.
As political observers and religious commentators continue to dissect Trump’s discourse, the intersections between faith, conviction, and political ambition remain highly significant. Trump’s rhetoric reflects not only his personal beliefs but also the expectations and aspirations of a considerable segment of his voter base.
The dialogue surrounding Trump’s messianic language prompts larger questions about the role of faith in politics. It raises essential inquiries about the boundaries between belief and ambition, as well as the resonant impact of divine imagery in framing political narratives.
Looking ahead, the conversation surrounding Trump’s divine references is likely to evolve, especially as the political landscape shifts. How this rhetoric will affect his worldview and influence among followers remains to be seen. Yet, it undeniably sets the stage for a robust discussion about the intersection of religion and politics in contemporary America.
