Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Expert Analysis of the Film ‘Conclave’ Following Pope Francis’ Passing
The recent surge in viewership of the film “Conclave” has captivated audiences after the death of Pope Francis. The film explores the intricate process of selecting a new pope. However, just how accurately does it reflect the actual events that transpired during this pivotal time?
The Rev. Bryan Pham, a Jesuit priest and associate director for Catholic Studies at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington, shared his insights with Fox News Digital. Pham observed that the movie accurately follows the timeline and sequence of events involved in the papal selection, including handling the pope’s death, relaying essential information, gathering the cardinals, and the overall procedures for electing a new pope.
Having been a graduate student in Rome during the last conclave that elected Pope Francis in 2013, Pham noted the authentic atmosphere of the cardinal’s discussions. He emphasized that the depiction of the side conversations among the cardinals regarding the church’s challenges and the characteristics sought in the new pope felt genuine.
Real Conversations vs. Hollywood Sensationalism
Although the film captures the essence of these conversations, they occur in a more formal setting known as the “general congregation.” Pham remarked that, despite the formalities, the cardinals are human, and informal discussions do take place, adding a layer of realism to the depiction.
“Conclave,” which premiered last year and won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay, features renowned actors such as Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, Isabella Rossellini, and John Lithgow. Pham characterized the real conclave as an extraordinary experience, albeit with some aspects of the film sensationalized for dramatic effect.
He pointed out that, while the movie aims for sensationalism and attempts to evoke scandals, which can perpetuate negative anti-Catholic sentiments, it also cleverly melds artistic cinematography with noteworthy storytelling. Pham noted, “There were beautiful images, and the cinematography was excellent. The actors delivered powerful performances, although I wish Isabella Rossellini had a more prominent role.”
Comparative Views on the Film’s Accuracy
Fox News contributor Raymond Arroyo, having witnessed three conclaves firsthand, expressed that the film’s viewership spike aligns with the public’s fascination during a papal transition. Arroyo remarked on the film’s appeal, stating that the ceremonies and traditions surrounding the election of a pope intrigue audiences largely.
Amazon Prime’s decision to make “Conclave” available for free streaming following the pope’s death further fueled interest in the film. Arroyo believes a far superior depiction of the conclave exists in 1968’s “The Shoes of the Fisherman,” which he argues presents a more compelling narrative.
Despite his critiques, Arroyo acknowledged that “Conclave” did manage to capture certain details of the papal rituals with accuracy. He emphasized that writing the ballot, swearing before the artwork of Michelangelo’s Last Judgment, and the ballot-counting procedures were depicted correctly, which added authenticity to the film.
Papal Politics and Realities
However, Arroyo criticized the film for its portrayal of political intrigue and melodramatic dialogue among cardinals, describing it as cartoonish. He asserted that while cardinals have pre-conclave discussions, the scandalous portrayals depicted in the film do not align with the actual dynamics of the conclave process.
During a conclave, cardinals convene under strict regulations, and Arroyo humorously referred to the dysfunctional depiction of the Vatican showcased in the movie, countering that the real situation possesses its dysfunctionality without embellishments.
Arroyo also clarified the process of how cardinals are housed during a conclave, explaining their transportation to the Sistine Chapel and confinement during the deliberation period. This practice stems from historical events when previous conclaves prolonged without reaching a decision, necessitating their confinement to expedite a resolution.
Understanding the Heart of the Church
While Arroyo praised various visual elements of the film, he deeply critiqued its ideological message. He pointed out a significant error in how the character played by Ralph Fiennes suggests that doubt constitutes an essential element of faith. Arroyo found this perspective contrary to core church teachings, stating that faith calls for belief rather than doubt.
The portrayal of doubt as pivotal to faith runs counter to the church’s core messages. Arroyo articulated that miracles defy natural law and evoke firm belief rather than uncertainty. This misconception could mislead audiences regarding the church’s teachings.
Furthermore, Arroyo argued that “Conclave” perpetuates an ideological vision that disconnects the church from its longstanding traditions and rituals. The film appears to promote a version of Catholicism that strays from the fundamental beliefs the church upholds.
Final Thoughts on ‘Conclave’
In conclusion, while “Conclave” presents a captivating cinematic experience, it simultaneously raises critical questions about portrayals of faith, tradition, and reality within the church. As audiences navigate through the dramatization of a significant event, it remains essential to distinguish between artistic interpretation and factual representation. Understanding the church’s profound practices and beliefs underscores the complexity of the papal conclave beyond the silver screen.
Ultimately, while the emotions and visuals portrayed in “Conclave” resonate with viewers, they should also caution against misconceptions that could arise from its sensationalism. The film serves as a conversation starter about faith, history, and the portrayal of the Catholic Church in modern media.
