Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Prince Harry faces calls from royal experts to concentrate on charitable activities following President Trump’s remarks regarding his immigration status. Such advice comes amid ongoing scrutiny of Harry’s past and his relocation to North America with Meghan Markle.
During a recent statement, Trump expressed a lack of interest in deporting the Duke of Sussex, a comment made as the couple arrived in Vancouver to commence the Invictus Games. Harry, now 40 years old, moved to California with his wife in 2020 after stepping away from royal duties in Britain.
The controversy around Harry intensified last year when the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, seeking the release of his immigration records. This action followed Harry’s admission to past drug use in his memoir, “Spare,” published in early 2023.
When asked about the possibility of deporting the royal, Trump replied, “;I will leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife.” The 78-year-old former president went on to describe Meghan as “terrible.”
A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding these statements.
Royal expert Hilary Fordwich noted this may be a pivotal moment for the Sussexes, especially Harry, to engage in what she terms consistent and impactful work. This approach could aid in transforming their public image.
Since relocating, the couple has shared their experiences grappling with royal life and the accompanying scrutiny. Fordwich suggested that they should minimize discussions surrounding personal grievances and instead allow their charitable work to speak volumes, thereby enhancing public trust.
Helena Chard, a British broadcaster and photographer, emphasized that Trump has a historical admiration for the British royal family. She asserted he would not risk damaging relationships with high-ranking royals, including King Charles III and heir Prince William.
According to Chard, although Trump’s comments indicated he would not deport Harry, circumstances surrounding validity of Harry’s visa could change if he is found to have lied on his immigration applications. Chard pointed out the complexities of the Sussexes’ relationship with Trump and noted that Trump’s disdain for Meghan complicates the matter further.
Meghan Markle, a former American actress, has previously criticized Trump, labeling him as misogynistic and divisive during an appearance before the 2016 election. Additionally, during Trump’s 2019 state visit to the UK, he referred to Meghan as “nasty” following her comments about him, although he later met with the royal family without her.
Trump’s relationship with Harry’s older brother William appears more favorable. Trump has openly praised William, calling him a great young man after their private meeting in Paris.
Chard articulated that the Sussexes continue to encounter waves of criticism five years after their move to Montecito, California. She stated that many do not appreciate Harry and Meghan’s criticisms of the royal family, especially given their history with the late Queen Elizabeth II.
Chard reiterated that Trump’s support for the monarchy likely influences his comments on Harry’s immigration status, suggesting that he sees the prince as a less urgent issue against the backdrop of larger political and immigration concerns.
The Invictus Games, an event rooted in Harry’s commitment to supporting sick and wounded service personnel, serves as one of his primary philanthropic efforts. Harry founded these games in London in 2014 after observing the U.S. Armed Forces’ Warrior Games, an experience that inspired him profoundly.
Chard remarked that the Invictus Games feature prominently in Harry’s charitable portfolio, promoting recovery and rehabilitation for veterans. She emphasized that the couple should showcase unity and prioritize shared appearances, although she also noted that Harry’s likability might warrant individual endeavors at times.
Fordwich noted that controversies involving the Sussexes have overshadowed their positive contributions. In her view, they need to manifest genuine activism devoid of public relations undertones to enhance their credibility.
Richard Fitzwilliams, a royal expert, suggested that a quieter approach could improve public views of Harry and Meghan. He acknowledged that the current immigration controversy may reignite discussions surrounding their royal roots.
Fitzwilliams shared a belief that if the Sussexes had refrained from publicizing their royal grievances, they would face less scrutiny and maintain a more favorable public reception.
The Heritage Foundation’s legal action claims that Harry may have misrepresented details related to his drug use and visa application. Nile Gardiner, a member of this think tank, previously stated their intention to urge the president to release Harry’s immigration records, emphasizing the legal authority Trump holds in this matter.
In the previous campaign, Trump hinted at potential legal action depending on the findings regarding Harry’s visa, although he refrained from confirming any intention to pursue deportation.
Trump accused the Biden administration of safeguarding Harry in a February interview, stating he wouldn’t extend the same protection, expressing disappointment over Harry’s perceived betrayal of the monarchy.
As he seeks to rebuild his image, Harry encounters unique challenges shaped by both his past and current events. Royal correspondent Neil Sean indicated that Harry may consider a temporary retreat from the U.S. as a strategic reset. Meanwhile, Meghan is expected to advance her career with a lifestyle series debuting soon.
The couple aims to carve distinct professional paths while Harry remains devoted to the Invictus Games. However, navigating their complicated relationship with the royal narrative remains a task fraught with hurdles.
Historically, the Sussexes’ saga has captured public attention, but their future hinges on adeptly managing their image while promoting the charitable foundations they believe in.