Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

As President Donald Trump seeks to finalize his ambitious 20-point plan aimed at resolving the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Israel stands at a critical crossroads. The proposed framework suggests a gradual Israeli evacuation from Gaza, the return of Israeli hostages, and a significant exchange of prisoners. In exchange, Hamas would agree to disarmament and the establishment of a transitional authority to oversee Gaza’s reconstruction.
However, this deal incorporates a controversial component that involves the release of hundreds of convicted Palestinian terrorists. This particular aspect has already sparked a strong backlash from the families of victims of terror.
Dr. Michael Milshtein, head of the Moshe Dayan Forum at Tel Aviv University and a prominent expert on Hamas, expressed grave concerns regarding the identities of a significant portion of the 250 individuals slated for release. He emphasized that many of these prisoners represent a substantial strategic threat to Israel.
Milshtein characterized these individuals not as mere low-level operatives but as influential leaders whose experience inside prison could transform them into powerful figures upon their release. He stated, “These individuals have established influence while incarcerated. When released, they will likely assume leadership roles once again.”
Using historical comparisons, Milshtein highlighted the dangers posed by past prisoner exchanges. Notably, several individuals currently under consideration for release have been linked to heinous acts of terror. Among them are:
Milshtein pointed out that many of the individuals who perpetrated the tragic events of October 7 were previously released as part of the 2011 Gilad Shalit deal. This raises further alarm among families affected by terror.
Families of terror victims, like that of Sharon Edri, who was murdered in 1996, have renewed their calls for vigilance as discussions about the proposed releases continue. Edri’s sister, Danielle Edri Karten, lives in New York. She articulated the deep emotional scars associated with such negotiations, stating, “We are joyfully anticipating the return of hostages but cannot overlook the potential risks involved in releasing dangerous individuals. The man in question should not be released, not only for my brother’s sake but due to the ongoing threat he represents.”
Izzy Karten, Edri’s nephew, echoed these sentiments. He remarked, “This individual has a history of horrific acts. He has previously participated in terrorist activities after being released from prison, including the horrific Apropo Café bombing. It is concerning that he now holds a senior position within Hamas while still incarcerated.”
As families grapple with the emotional implications of potential releases, the overarching hope remains steady: the safe return of all hostages without compromising security.
In response to these developments, the families have initiated a petition aimed at convincing the Israeli government to prevent the release of Al-Hur and any future trades involving convicted terrorists. This grassroots effort underscores the community’s desire for justice in the face of daunting negotiations that threaten to repeat past errors.
During Sharon Edri’s funeral nearly three decades ago, Netanyahu assured the family, “We are communicating to the perpetrators—your actions will not deter our resolve.” The current circumstances raise concerns that these promises may not be upheld.
A looming threat to the plans is a demand from Hamas for the release of around 90 members of its elite