Federal Grants Expose Spending on Gender Ideology and LGBTQI+ Advocacy

Exclusive Report: The Biden administration has allocated over $174 million in federal grants aimed at promoting progressive gender ideology. A newly released database titled “Funding Insanity” outlines various initiatives, including studies on menstrual cycles in transgender men and efforts to bolster LGBTQI+ rights in the Western Balkans.

Concerns Over Government Spending

According to Terry Schilling, President of the American Principles Project, taxpayers rightfully expect their funds to support critical national priorities such as defense, infrastructure, and environmental protection. He expressed concerns that public money has instead been funneled towards what he describes as a radical gender agenda. “Hundreds of millions of dollars have been squandered on programs promoting the idea that human biology doesn’t matter,” Schilling stated.

The “Funding Insanity” Database

The American Principles Project, a conservative advocacy group dedicated to defending traditional family values, launched the “Funding Insanity” database this Thursday. The comprehensive database catalogs numerous projects—both domestic and international—that received taxpayer funding to advance left-leaning gender policies.

High-Cost Programs and Initiatives

Among the notable expenditures, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) allotted $1,929,783 to the American Bar Association. This funding is intended to assist LGBTQI+ individuals in the Western Balkans by enhancing human rights, ensuring information integrity, and fostering democracy.

The Balkans region encompasses countries like Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, and Albania. While some nations recognize civil partnerships, the overwhelming majority do not acknowledge same-sex marriage.

Another grant involved $600,000 from the Department of Agriculture, designated to Southern University A&M in Louisiana. This funding aims to study menstrual cycles, including those affecting transgender men and non-binary individuals. The grant focuses on addressing growing issues related to menstruation and explores the use of natural materials for health products.

New Perspectives on Menstruation

The proposal highlights that menstruation typically begins around age 12 and concludes with menopause at approximately 51 years. It states that individuals of various gender identities may experience menstruation, reflecting a diverse understanding of biological processes.

International Cultural Initiatives

In addition to the earlier grants, USAID spent nearly $25,000 in support of international cultural programming. Funds were allocated to showcase a Gujarati translation of “The Vagina Monologues” in India, aimed at promoting social change, women’s empowerment, and addressing gender-based violence through theatre.

This feminist play, originally performed in the United States in 1996, explores numerous critical issues, including rape and gender identity.

Addressing Gender Diversity Worldwide

Moreover, USAID invested $1,065,702 in a welfare organization in Bangladesh, supporting projects for gender-diverse individuals under the name “Shomota,” which translates to “equality” in English. A separate grant involving the State Department allocated $2,315 to a Nepali NGO, aimed at teaching English to professional transgender women makeup entrepreneurs.

A Shift in Government Priorities

Schilling believes that the misuse of taxpayer funds for such initiatives is being scrutinized. He advocated for a reassessment of how government spending is directed, asserting that taxpayers deserve better accountability for their contributions.

With the recent electoral shifts, Schilling noted that citizens have provided a mandate to prioritize efficiency and accountability within governmental agencies.

Calls for Accountability in Government Spending

Amid these developments, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has assumed the role of acting director of USAID. He indicated that the agency must align with Trump’s “America First” policies, emphasizing vigilance over foreign aid distribution.

Criticism from Democratic lawmakers has intensified, particularly regarding the current administration’s reshaping of federal agencies. Many argue that this reflects a detrimental prioritization of partisan agendas over effective governance.

Community and Congressional Reactions

Sen. Chris Van Hollen voiced his concerns during public protests, framing the current political landscape as an unprecedented betrayal of democratic principles. He emphasized the necessity for civic engagement across various platforms to challenge what he views as government corruption.

In response, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt condemned the rhetoric from Democratic officials, asserting that the administration is committed to enhancing government efficiency and ensuring taxpayer dollars are used effectively.

Moving Forward: Rethinking Federal Funding

As the landscape of federal funding continues to evolve, the insights gained from the “Funding Insanity” database may prove pivotal in informing future budgetary decisions. The findings underscore the need for transparency and accountability in the allocation of taxpayer resources, ensuring they reflect the values and priorities of the American public.