Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Flick International Dimly lit office space with clutter and an email notification titled 'What did you do last week? Part II.'

Federal Workers Express Concern Over DOGE Email Demands for Weekly Accomplishments

Federal Workers Express Concern Over DOGE Email Demands for Weekly Accomplishments

A federal employee recently characterized the DOGE emails, which require workers to report their five weekly accomplishments, as threatening and harassing. The emails have stirred significant anxiety among government employees.

Cathy, a federal worker, recounted her experience during an MSNBC interview held at a town hall in Haymarket, Virginia, stating, “It came out wanting us to justify our jobs with five things we did.” This requirement has raised serious concerns about the pressures federal workers face in a challenging work environment.

She highlighted the burden of managing her workload while dealing with distractions from the executive branch. “Last week was on Saturday night, and I was literally working on Saturday night to make up for all the distractions I had had the previous week,” she explained. “And then I get that email on top of it. It’s very hard to keep your train of thought when you’re getting threatened and harassed like that.” This statement underscores the increasing stress levels among federal employees as they navigate their responsibilities.

Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX and Tesla, who is leading President Donald Trump’s DOGE initiative, has played a central role in promoting the emails dispatched by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). These communications urge federal employees to submit a list of their five accomplishments from the prior week.

The OPM has sent multiple emails, including one last weekend and another earlier this week, with the subject line “What did you do last week? Part II.” This recurring demand has sparked controversies and gained significant traction across social media platforms and news outlets.

The latest email urged employees to “reply to this email with approximately five bullets detailing what you accomplished last week and cc your manager.” This might seem like a simple request; however, the tone and timing of the emails have elicited mounting frustration among recipients.

Responses are expected by 11:59 PM Eastern Time on Monday, with additional instructions for employees working with sensitive or classified information to specify the nature of their activities in their replies. This additional layer of requirement has further complicated an already taxing process for federal workers.

MSNBC host Ali Vitali, who reported from the town hall, revealed that numerous federal employees are turning to anxiety medication as a coping mechanism due to the stress stemming from these emails. “There is such anxiety and concern about their own financial well-being, their own ability also to continue serving the American public,” Vitali shared. “One woman told me she called her doctor to get on anti-anxiety medication because the harassment and the barrage of emails has been so aggressive.” This observation highlights the mental health repercussions resulting from job-related pressures.

Another participant, a federal contractor named Andrea, expressed that “everyone is on pins and needles.” She noted that there are long-term professionals close to retirement who are enduring the challenges to support their colleagues and contribute to the mission of the department. “The jobs that we do are so stressful. And to have this on top of it… I know that their goal is to make it miserable. So the people that are staying and fighting, I just can’t thank them enough,” she emphasized.

Employer Expectations and Employee Strain

The pressures placed on federal workers by the emails exemplify a broader concern within the public sector about job security and employee well-being. Many employees feel that their value is constantly scrutinized and judged, leading to an acute sense of anxiety.

Federal workers have expressed worries about their future in the workforce, often compounded by financial uncertainties. As Cathy pointed out, the environment surrounding these demands is laden with pressure, making it challenging to maintain productivity while also trying to meet expectations laid upon them.

Despite these challenges, some employees are determined to persevere. They recognize the importance of their roles in supporting the nation’s security and functioning, even when faced with additional burdens from workplace demands.

The Mental Health Toll

The mental health implications of these emails cannot be understated. The requirement to constantly validate one’s work performance underlines a toxic work environment that leaves many feeling undervalued and overworked. Vitali’s report of employees seeking medication to manage stress illustrates the urgent need for a reevaluation of workplace practices within federal agencies.

Federal structures must adopt policies that prioritize the well-being of their employees while fostering an environment of trust and support. Ensuring that workers feel appreciated for their contributions can potentially mitigate the anxiety-induced responses to demanding emails.

A Call for Change

The ongoing situation relating to the DOGE emails has ignited a discussion about the management of federal workforces and the expectations placed on employees. As public sector work evolves, agencies must adapt their strategies to promote a more supportive atmosphere, recognizing that the mental health of their employees is critical to overall productivity.

Reflecting on the experiences shared by Cathy and Andrea reveals that change is necessary. Workers should not feel that their jobs hinge on the ability to produce five specific accomplishments each week under pressure. Rather, fostering an environment that encourages open communication and support will ultimately lead to more engaged and productive employees.

In an era where employee well-being is paramount for organizational success, federal agencies must listen to the voices of their workers. Only then can they transform challenging work environments into spaces that promote growth, innovation, and respect.