Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
WARNING: This article contains disturbing details. Reader discretion is advised.
A former lieutenant in the Coast Guard has been arrested following allegations of threats made against President Donald Trump. Court documents reveal that Peter Stinson, a Virginia resident, is under investigation for making serious threats to assassinate the President, according to statements from the FBI.
Stinson, who served in the United States Coast Guard from 1988 until 2021, held multiple roles during his military career, including sharpshooter and FEMA instructor. His extensive background raises concerns regarding the seriousness of the threats communicated through various online platforms.
Details of the Alleged Threats
An affidavit from an FBI task force officer outlines a series of online threats made by Stinson. On May 9, he allegedly stated that Trump needed to be “[L]uigied,” a term referencing an individual implicated in a high-profile murder case involving Brian Thompson, the CEO of United Healthcare.
Further investigations into Stinson’s social media activity reveal a concerning pattern. He reportedly issued explicit threats involving various means of attack, including firearms, poisoning, and knives. These comments were not only disturbing but also hinted at his admitted lack of skills necessary for carrying out an assassination.
Allegations of Anti-Government Sentiment
In his online communications, Stinson made chilling references to the number 8647, which authorities believe ties back to a controversial Instagram post made by former FBI Director James Comey. This association has drawn attention, as Comey’s post was interpreted in media reports as a violent implication against Trump, prompting a thorough investigation by the Department of Homeland Security and the United States Secret Service.
The affidavit highlights Stinson’s ongoing engagement on social media. Notably, he has made 13 posts on Bluesky, including the phrase “8647,” indicating a disturbing dedication to the theme of violence.
Connections to Extremist Groups
The investigation also uncovered that Stinson has identified himself as a member of ANTIFA. On February 2, he posted on his X account, stating, “Sure. This is war. Sides will be drawn. Antifa always wins in the end. Violence is inherently necessary.” This statement raises critical questions about the intersection of his alleged threats and his affiliations with extremist groups.
Recent Activities and Implications
The most recent entry in his social media history, dated June 11, featured a chilling outlook on Trump’s potential demise. Stinson wrote, “When he dies, the party is going to be yuge,” which underscores the gravity of his rhetoric.
On charging Stinson with threats against the President, the legal ramifications of these allegations could be significant. He is expected to make his initial appearance in federal court on Wednesday, facing serious charges that might have far-reaching consequences.
Public Safety and Political Climate
These developments resonate within a broader context of political tension and heightened threats against public figures. The FBI is taking measures to ensure public safety, especially as threats escalate in a politically charged environment.
This specific incident emphasizes the importance of monitoring individuals who express violent sentiments online. Law enforcement agencies are tasked with distinguishing between free speech and real threats that could endanger lives.
The Role of Social Media in Threat Detection
Stinson’s case illustrates the pivotal role social media plays in law enforcement’s detection of potential threats. As sites like X and Bluesky have become platforms for political discourse, they equally serve as venues for hateful and violent expressions. Investigating online behavior not only aids in preventative measures but also raises ethical questions regarding privacy and free speech.
As authorities continue to assess the implications of this case, they underline the necessity of vigilance to prevent potential violence stemming from online threats. The situation remains dynamic, and updates from the federal court will provide further clarity on the legal trajectory for Stinson.
The Road Ahead for Law Enforcement
As the nation navigates a period marked by significant political polarization, the need for a comprehensive approach to security is clearer than ever. Threats against public figures not only pose immediate concerns but also reflect deeper societal issues that warrant attention.
With Stinson’s trial looming, a careful examination of his motivations and affiliations will be crucial. This case serves as a reminder that while free speech is a fundamental right, it can carry implications that threaten the safety of individuals and the public at large.
Fox News Digital’s Brooke Curto contributed to this report.
