Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Nearly one year after Melissa Batie-Smoose faced unemployment due to San Jose State University’s non-renewal of her contract as an assistant volleyball coach, she now watches the institution grapple with consequences from the federal government.
Batie-Smoose gained prominence within the “Save Women’s Sports” movement after she filed a Title IX complaint against the university concerning its treatment of transgender athlete Blaire Fleming in the fall of 2024. Her complaint marked the beginning of public allegations that Fleming had conspired with another player to injure SJSU volleyball co-captain Brooke Slusser during a match by spiking her in the face.
Consequently, Batie-Smoose was suspended from her position and has not secured employment in her field since then. A year later, she received a reaffirming update from the U.S. Department of Education.
On Wednesday, the department officially determined that SJSU violated Title IX in its management of Fleming’s situation. This decision is significant and has raised Batie-Smoose’s hopes for accountability.
“Personally, it represents a big win for me,” Batie-Smoose told Fox News Digital. “It was uplifting to hear confirmation of what we knew all along, that we were wronged in regard to the actions that female athletes and myself faced. I consider today a pivotal victory.”
Now, she seeks to establish tangible repercussions for the university’s actions.
“To move forward, my focus is on winning in the courts and ensuring the university faces high stakes for their decisions,” she insisted.
Despite this recent progress, Batie-Smoose emphasizes that the fight is far from over.
“We have a significant battle ahead of us that we must approach at the highest levels in the court system,” she stated. “It’s not finished yet. I don’t want anyone to believe this journey has concluded.”
Batie-Smoose has formally filed a lawsuit against the Board of Trustees of the California State University system, within which SJSU is one of 23 member institutions. According to Batie-Smoose and her attorney, Vernadette Broyles, the suspension was a retaliatory action in response to her Title IX complaint concerning Fleming.
They anticipate the Department of Education’s ruling on SJSU will bolster their case in court.
“We expect that this will positively impact her lawsuit,” Broyles explained. “When the agency responsible for enforcing federal law has concluded a violation occurred, it carries significant weight in court. Courts often pay close attention to such findings from subject matter experts.”
Broyles also expressed her desire for the Department of Education to intervene in the lawsuit directly.
“We would welcome the Department of Education’s involvement, whether through direct intervention or by issuing a statement of interest. This support would be tremendously beneficial for us,” she added.
In a timely manner, the Department of Education granted SJSU ten days to comply with specific stipulations or face possible enforcement action.
These actions include necessary reforms to ensure Title IX compliance. Batie-Smoose views these requirements as only the starting point.
“To me, these terms are merely the bare minimum,” she stated. “The university should face greater repercussions for their actions.”
Broyles believes that SJSU will be “highly motivated” to cooperate with the federal government, although she acknowledges that compliance is not guaranteed.
“As they navigate this situation, there’s potential for the Trump administration to reconsider the university’s federal funding,” Broyles warned. “This could have enormous implications. It would only make sense for them to engage with a federal government that provides substantial funding.”
Batie-Smoose’s journey began with a relocation from Connecticut to California in 2023, based on her understanding that her role would strictly involve coaching female athletes.
However, she claims she was misled about Fleming’s presence on the team until she pressed for clarification. During this inquiry, head coach Todd Kress eventually confirmed her suspicions weeks into her tenure. Allegedly, she was instructed not to disclose this information to teammates or their families.
When she received her suspension in the fall of 2024, it came as a shock just minutes before a home match against New Mexico State. Batie-Smoose reported that she had personal belongings on campus that she could not collect, and she asserts that she was never explicitly informed which specific action had led to her punishment besides vague claims of violating FERPA regulations.
Now, over a year later, she has relocated her family to Texas in search of a “safer” environment while navigating the challenges of her professional journey.
“It has been a rough transition,” Batie-Smoose acknowledged. “I continue to look for coaching opportunities, yet this situation still affects my career. It has been a struggle for all of us.”
Batie-Smoose’s determination reflects a broader struggle within collegiate athletics as concerns over fairness and equality in sports continue to dominate discussions. This case highlights the complexities faced by institutions and individuals navigating policies surrounding gender inclusion in sports.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the implications of the Department of Education’s ruling will be closely monitored, setting a precedent for future cases regarding Title IX and athlete inclusion.
With prominent voices like Batie-Smoose advocating for accountability, the stakes have never been higher for universities facing similar challenges. The outcomes could reshape the landscape of women’s sports as stakeholders seek to find a balance between inclusivity and fair competition.