Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Maryland Governor Wes Moore has officially confirmed that he will not be traveling to El Salvador after the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a controversial figure referred to as the “Maryland man.” Moore’s decision comes in the wake of discussions surrounding Abrego Garcia’s situation, which has become a focal point of political debate.
This past weekend, during his attendance at a social event in Washington, Moore responded to a query from Fox News Digital regarding a potential trip to visit Abrego Garcia. The question was prompted by Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen’s recent high-profile visit to El Salvador. Van Hollen sought to advocate for Abrego Garcia’s release from prison and his return to the U.S.
Moore’s reply was succinct and lighthearted. He stated, “I’m not. Planning on having a good night tonight,” while sporting a smile and a black tuxedo at the White House Correspondents Dinner.
Later, Fox News Digital pressed him further, inquiring whether he believed Abrego Garcia should be returned to the United States. Moore, however, sidestepped the question with a casual response, saying, “Hi man, have a great night. Thank you,” as he walked away.
Despite his playful demeanor at the event, Moore has expressed support for Senator Van Hollen’s efforts on social media. Earlier this month, he praised Van Hollen’s leadership and reiterated his commitment to ensuring Abrego Garcia’s safety. Moore stated, “I’m grateful for @ChrisVanHollen’s leadership and his efforts to ensure Kilmar is safe and will be brought back home to Maryland,” through a post on X.
Moore’s office further confirmed his lack of plans to travel to El Salvador on Tuesday when reached for comment by Fox News Digital. His stance echoes an earlier statement made last week when he clarified that he had no intention of visiting, despite Van Hollen’s trip garnering significant media attention.
The deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia has incited substantial criticism among Democrats. Some party members have rallied around the issue, urging for his safe return to the United States.
The case has garnered national attention, particularly due to conflicting statements surrounding Abrego Garcia’s deportation. Originally, the Trump administration asserted that Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported, which sparked a deeper investigation into the circumstances of his removal.
Governor Moore emphasized the importance of due process in Abrego Garcia’s case. He stated, “This is a case about due process, and it’s a case about, are we going to follow the Constitution or not?” Moore claims it is essential to reverse the deportation to ensure Abrego Garcia can stand trial and that judicial mechanisms are in place to assess any legal violations. He firmly believes in upholding due process and constitutional rights.
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s order for the Trump administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return, El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele voiced his concerns about Abrego Garcia’s alleged connections to gangs. Bukele has made it clear that he will not allow Abrego Garcia to be released to the United States.
The deportation has fueled outrage among various Democratic lawmakers. Several, including Representatives Maxwell Frost from Florida and Robert Garcia from California, joined Senator Van Hollen in a visit to El Salvador to advocate for Abrego Garcia’s rights.
Currently, Abrego Garcia is being held at a lower-security facility in El Salvador. This follows his transfer from the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, a notorious prison known for housing numerous suspected criminals and gang members. His situation continues to unfold amid ongoing political conversations regarding immigration and due process in the United States.
The complexities surrounding Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s deportation highlight broader issues related to immigration and the legal rights of individuals facing deportation. Governor Wes Moore’s decisions and statements about the situation reflect the ongoing dialogue among Maryland lawmakers as they navigate these challenging issues. As this situation develops, the political ramifications are likely to resonate within Maryland and beyond.