Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A 175-year-old family farm in New Jersey faces a critical battle as its co-owner speaks out against local government efforts to seize the land for affordable housing. Andy Henry, co-owner of the historic farm located in Cranbury, New Jersey, is determined to fight back against this eminent domain initiative.
Henry and his brother Christopher manage the family farm that has been in their family since 1850. In a recent interview on a national news program, he shared his frustrations regarding the township’s plans to seize 21 acres of the farm.
“We received a letter on April 24 informing us of this unfortunate decision that Cranbury officials wanted to take the entire property,” Henry stated. He described how the situation escalated from a complete seizure to a proposal that would only take half of the farm, leaving them with an unviable operation.
The Cranbury Township Committee recently announced a housing strategy that would permit them to seize the Henry family farm. This initiative stems from a New Jersey mandate requiring municipalities in the state to construct over 146,000 affordable housing units by the year 2035. The situation has gained attention, raising questions about the rights of landowners versus the need for more affordable housing.
Henry articulated his feelings on the matter, stating, “It makes me feel terrible. It was a shock. We are surrounded by warehouses and have been turning down developers for years. We just wanted to be left alone and take care of our place like my ancestors did before us.” His sentiments reflect a broader concern among farmers facing similar pressures from local governments.
The Henry family has consistently turned down offers from developers over the years in an endeavor to keep the farm within the family. This commitment to preserving their land is personal, representing more than simply agricultural land; it symbolizes their family’s legacy and the community’s history.
During the interview, the host asked Henry what the farm meant to his family. He emphasized that the farm serves as an essential part of not only his family’s history but also the Cranbury community’s identity. “It’s part of our legacy, and I’ve said it’s part of the town of Cranbury, too,” he remarked.
Henry continued, “This historic farm contributed to the town’s growth. In those early days, you couldn’t go to a grocery store; local farmers provided food directly within the community.” His reference underscores the integral role that agriculture has played in shaping small towns across America.
The Cranbury community has rallied behind the Henry family, demonstrating their support through various means. A GoFundMe page was established to aid the family in covering legal expenses associated with their fight against the land seizure. As of late June, the campaign successfully raised over $100,000, highlighting the community’s commitment to preserving its agricultural heritage.
The efforts to seize the Henry family farm have attracted political attention beyond local concerns. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins publicly commented about the ongoing battle in early June. Writing in a social media post, she characterized the situation as part of a wider trend regarding government interference with family farms.
Rollins remarked that the current administration’s policies could threaten family-operated farms and emphasized that the USDA would explore every legal option to support the Henrys and similar cases across the country.
The struggle of the Henry family resonates with many other farmers facing encroachments from local governments eager to develop land for housing and commercial projects. As the demand for affordable housing continues to grow, local authorities are challenged to balance community needs with the rights of long-standing landowners.
While the Henry family’s fight continues, their story serves as a reflection of the broader issues facing American farmers today. Their battle against the imposition of eminent domain illuminates the critical intersection between land use policies, family legacies, and community values.
In summary, the ongoing situation highlights how essential it is to protect family farms, not just for their historical value but also for their role in local economies and food production. As the community stands firm in support of the Henry family, they emphasize the significance of preserving such agricultural legacies for future generations.
The case of the Henry family farm is likely to continue evolving as local officials and the community engage in discussions about development and land use. The outcome could set a precedent for how similar situations are handled across New Jersey and beyond.
With ongoing national conversations regarding affordable housing, rural land use regulations, and the rights of family farms, the complexities surrounding the Henrys’ plight exemplify the challenge of navigating these critical issues.