Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Families of hostages taken by Hamas in Gaza, along with a freed captive, are expressing deep concern over the recent announcements by the United Kingdom, France, and other nations regarding the recognition of a Palestinian state. They argue that such recognition would reward Hamas terrorists while innocent hostages remain imprisoned underground.
The criticism emerged after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared that his government plans to officially recognize a Palestinian state at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, permits United Nations aid, and commits to a two-state solution.
Emily Damari, a dual British-Israeli citizen who endured 471 days of captivity under Hamas, shared her thoughts on social media. She stated, “As a Dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by your decision, Keir Starmer, to recognize Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace; it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message that violence earns legitimacy.”
Damari emphasized that legitimizing a state while Hamas continues to wield control over Gaza only prolongs the conflict rather than promoting peace. “Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you,” she wrote.
The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, representing relatives of those still held in Gaza, echoed Damari’s sentiments. They condemned the recent shift toward recognizing a Palestinian state, stating, “Recently, we have seen a surge in initiatives advocating for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state — all while 50 hostages have been held captive by Hamas for 663 days. Recognizing a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism. Such recognition does not represent a path toward peace; rather, it constitutes a violation of international law and a dangerous political failure that legitimizes war crimes.”
They further emphasized the severity of the situation: “The abduction of men, women, and children, confined against their will in tunnels and subjected to starvation and psychological abuse, cannot and should not serve as a foundation for establishing a state. If the international community genuinely desires peace, it must align with the United States in demanding the release of all hostages first, followed by an end to the fighting.”
On the same day as Starmer’s announcement, it was revealed that France intends to pursue similar recognition. In the wake of these statements, ten additional countries expressed plans to follow suit. Malta confirmed it will proceed, while Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal, and San Marino also indicated intentions to move in that direction. Spain, Ireland, Norway, and Belgium have similarly expressed their support. The Netherlands, once known as a strong ally of Israel, has hardened its position, threatening to exclude Israel from an EU research program and denying entry to Israeli ministers.
During a meeting with Starmer in Scotland, President Donald Trump commented on the situation while speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One. He remarked, “Essentially, they are saying the same thing, and that’s OK. But you know it doesn’t mean I have to agree with them.” His statement reflects ongoing tensions regarding international approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Veteran U.S. diplomat Dennis Ross also weighed in on the issue, cautioning that recognition of a Palestinian state without established conditions could exacerbate the conflict. He posted on social media, “Recognizing a Palestinian state without conditions will perpetuate the conflict, not end it. What are the conditions? Leaders must be credibly committed to coexistence and non-violence, no independent militias, and no alliances with rejectionists. Moreover, there must be recognition of historical Jewish ties to the land.”
The remarks from both families of hostages and diplomatic leaders indicate a complex and sensitive balance in international relations regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As nations consider recognizing the state of Palestine, the voices of those directly affected by the ongoing violence serve as a critical reminder of the human cost associated with political decisions.
Ultimately, the reactions from the families of hostages challenge the international community to contemplate the implications of its actions and the message such recognition sends in a volatile conflict. The demand for hostages’ release resonates strongly, and it remains a pivotal issue as countries navigate their diplomatic stances on Palestine.
As discussions continue, the ultimate question revolves around the ability to forge a lasting peace, a goal that remains elusive in light of the current dynamics. Recognizing a state should ideally lead to stability and security but must not come at the expense of those who have suffered deeply due to violence.
