Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
EXCLUSIVE TO FOX: House allies of President Donald Trump are taking decisive steps to hold former FBI Director James Comey accountable following his controversial Instagram post featuring the phrase ’86 47′. This move signals a significant escalation in the ongoing political battles surrounding former government officials.
Representative August Pfluger of Texas, who chairs the Republican Study Committee (RSC) comprising 189 members, is leading the charge by introducing a resolution in conjunction with Representative Laurel Lee from Florida. This resolution serves to condemn Comey for his perceived role in ‘incitement of violence against President Donald J. Trump.’
The three-page resolution characterizes Comey’s post as ‘disturbing’. It explicitly calls on the relevant authorities to take necessary actions to ensure that Comey is never employed in any federal capacity again.
Further, the resolution urges the Department of Justice (DOJ) to not only investigate this incident but also disclose the findings to both the House committee involved and the American public.
Comey’s post, which showcased seashells arranged to form the numbers ’86 47′, ignited a fierce backlash across social media, with Trump supporters and other Republican figures quickly accusing him of inciting violence against the former president.
In response to the controversy, Comey deleted the post and issued a clarification. He stated, ‘I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.’
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem informed the Associated Press that Comey is currently under investigation by the Trump administration concerning this matter.
Pfluger and Lee’s resolution emphasizes that Comey made the Instagram post while Trump was engaged in a diplomatic mission to the Middle East. The resolution argues that this timing could have jeopardized the President’s security and emboldened adversaries abroad.
They also referenced two documented attempts on Trump’s life during the most recent election cycle, highlighting a specific incident from a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where Trump was reportedly shot in the ear.
Representative Lee, who has previously served on the House task force investigating the Butler rally shooting, asserted the severity of Comey’s actions. She explained, ‘Having failed in his attempts to take down President Trump as one of the main architects of the Russia collusion hoax, Comey has now resorted to the unthinkable: calling for violence against our Commander-in-Chief.’
Pfluger expressed his concern to Fox News Digital, stating, ‘That someone who once held one of our nation’s most sacred positions of law enforcement would incite such dangerous rhetoric is not just alarming—it’s disqualifying and un-American. This resolution demands the accountability and transparency the American people deserve, ensuring Comey never again holds a position of public trust.’
Fox News Digital made several attempts to contact Comey and his representatives for comment, but received no response by press time.
The Broader Implications of the Resolution
This resolution is more than a condemnation of Comey; it highlights the increasing tensions within the GOP and the partisan divide surrounding figures associated with the Trump administration. As Republican lawmakers seek to reinforce their loyalty to Trump, they also signal to their constituents that they are willing to confront those they perceive as threats to the party’s values.
The fallout from Comey’s Instagram post and the accompanying resolution may have long-standing implications for political discourse, particularly as the nation prepares for the upcoming elections. Republican lawmakers are clearly responding to a constituency that is alarmed by perceived injustices and are striving to communicate that they stand firm against any form of violence or disrespect towards the presidency.
Public Reaction and Political Landscape
The public’s reaction to this situation has been polarized. On one side, Trump supporters see the resolution as a necessary step toward ensuring accountability among government officials who step outside the bounds of propriety. On the other hand, critics label these actions as politically motivated and an attempt to stifle dissenting voices.
As this story unfolds, it remains clear that the GOP-led initiative to rein in figures like Comey may resonate with voters concerned about violence and threats to national security. However, it also risks alienating moderate Republicans and independents who may view the resolution as a means to silence political opposition.
It will be crucial to observe how this situation develops and the impact it has on both Comey’s future and the political landscape as a whole. The resolution represents a broader narrative that portrays Comey as emblematic of what some Republicans consider an overreach by former officials who challenge party loyalty.
Ultimately, this conflict may serve to clarify lines within the GOP while simultaneously engaging voters on issues of security, accountability, and the future of political discourse in the United States. Both sides of the aisle will undoubtedly use this narrative as they frame discussions leading up to the 2024 elections.
