House Republicans Urge Trump to Abandon ‘One China’ Policy and Support Taiwan’s Independence

FIRST ON FOX: A bipartisan group of two dozen House Republicans is advocating for a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy by introducing a resolution to formally recognize Taiwan as an independent nation. This move could provoke strong reactions from leadership in Beijing.

The resolution, introduced by Representatives Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.) and Scott Perry (R-Pa.), calls on former President Donald Trump to reject the longstanding U.S. ‘One China’ policy. Instead, it urges him to acknowledge Taiwan’s autonomy and to treat it as a self-governing state.

“Taiwan has never been under the control of the People’s Republic of China – not a single day. It is a free, democratic, and independent nation, and it is time for U.S. policy to reflect this undeniable truth,” stated Tiffany in a recent announcement.

Furthermore, the resolution emphasizes the importance of facilitating Taiwan’s participation in international trade organizations and encourages negotiations for a bilateral U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement. This step is viewed as critical for bolstering Taiwan’s economy and international standing.

The Historical Context of U.S.-Taiwan Relations

The U.S. maintained formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan until 1979 when President Jimmy Carter recognized the Communist government in Beijing. Subsequently, Congress enacted the Taiwan Relations Act, which allowed for unofficial relations and continued military assistance to Taiwan.

Currently, only twelve independent nations recognize the Taipei government. A shift in U.S. policy could further escalate tensions with China, which views Taiwan as a breakaway province. Previous military aid sent to Taiwan prompted warnings from China’s foreign ministry, which claimed the U.S. was “playing with fire” and urged a halt to actions that threaten peace in the Taiwan Strait.

Impact of Current U.S. Policies on Taiwan

U.S. military analysts predict that by 2027, China could be fully prepared for a military assault on Taiwan. Historically, the U.S. has maintained ambiguity surrounding its defense commitments to the island, a strategy aimed at deterring aggressive actions from Beijing.

Recently, Trump implemented an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods, prompting reciprocal measures from China. In a related context, he also called for increased U.S. control over the Panama Canal to counteract Chinese influence.

Nevertheless, Trump’s statements during his campaign indicate reluctance to engage militarily to safeguard Taiwan. In an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek, he remarked, “I think Taiwan should pay us for defense,” likening the U.S. role to that of an insurance company.

Taiwan’s Historical Relationship with China

The division between Taiwan and China traces back to the civil war of 1949, resulting in Taiwan developing its own government and identity. The Chinese Communist Party has consistently asserted its intention to reunite Taiwan with the mainland, even threatening military action if necessary. Recently, increased military activity in the Taiwan Strait underscores the growing risks in the region.

Support for the New Resolution

The resolution has garnered support from a diverse range of Republican lawmakers, blending interventionist and America First approaches. Notable co-sponsors include Representatives Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Carlos Gimenez (Fla.), Andy Ogles (Tenn.), and Kat Cammack (Fla.). This coalition reflects a growing consensus among Republicans regarding Taiwan’s crucial role in U.S. foreign policy and Asian geopolitical stability.

Final Thoughts: A Call for Change in U.S. Policy

The call for a formal recognition of Taiwan is reflective of a broader shift in U.S. attitudes towards China and its assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region. Acknowledging Taiwan as an independent nation could signify a pivotal change in American foreign policy, with profound implications for U.S.-China relations. As the political landscape develops, the future of Taiwan and its standing on the global stage remains uncertain, yet the demand for recognition grows more urgent.