Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., sharply criticized Representative Al Green, D-Texas, for what he termed “shameful and egregious behavior” during President Donald Trump’s recent address to a joint session of Congress. Johnson expelled Green from the House chamber, accusing him of deliberately violating House rules.
The Speaker’s strong condemnation came shortly after a resolution to censure Green passed despite an attempt by his Democratic colleagues to dismiss it.
In a post on social media platform X, Johnson asserted that Green “disgraced the institution of Congress” through his protests during Trump’s address. He also called upon Democratic members to support the censure vote.
Representative Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., introduced the censure resolution on Wednesday. Following the failed motion from Democrats to table the resolution, it is expected to advance to a full House vote.
Green appeared to anticipate the censure, indicating he would be willing to face any resulting punishment. After being removed from the address, he tweeted reminders about the impending vote on the censure.
While numerous resolutions aimed at censuring Green have circulated, sources confirmed that Newhouse had coordinated with House GOP leadership regarding his resolution since the conclusion of Trump’s address.
Speaker Johnson expressed his concerns regarding Green’s actions, stating, “I think [Green’s protest] is unprecedented. Certainly in the modern era. It wasn’t a spontaneous reaction but rather a planned, prolonged protest,” during a press briefing on Wednesday.
During Trump’s address, Green interrupted following the president’s assertion that the 2024 election represented “a mandate like has not been seen in many decades” and highlighted recent GOP victories.
After issuing a warning to Green to take his seat, Johnson’s request went unheeded. Consequently, he instructed the Sergeant at Arms to remove the Texas lawmaker from the chamber.
In an interview outside the event, Green explained, “The president said he had a mandate, and I was making it clear to the president that he had no mandate to cut Medicaid.” He noted that this sentiment was echoed on paddles held during the Democrats’ silent protest.
Notably, Representative Green was the only Democrat to vocally disrupt the president’s speech that night. Other members of his party chose alternative forms of protest, such as holding signs or exiting the chamber early.
Should the censure resolution pass, it will not impose penalties but will formally condemn Green’s actions as deemed inappropriate by the House. Similar resolutions have previously been passed against other lawmakers, such as former Representatives Adam Schiff and Jamaal Bowman, along with Representative Rashida Tlaib.
The incident has sparked discussions about decorum and respect in congressional proceedings. The political climate seems increasingly polarized, making such disruptive behavior a focal point in the ongoing discourse between parties.
House Speaker Johnson’s actions reflect a growing trend among congressional leaders to address what they view as breaches of conduct. As members of Congress continue to grapple with important issues facing the nation, maintaining decorum during official addresses may become a hotly debated topic.
As the censure vote approaches, the outcome may have significant implications not only for Representative Green but also for congressional standards of behavior moving forward. The very nature of political discourse is under scrutiny, and how lawmakers conduct themselves in formal settings will undoubtedly shape public perception.
Ultimately, this situation underscores the importance of maintaining a professional environment within Congress, particularly during significant presidential addresses. As both parties navigate this issue, the focus will remain on fostering respect while addressing critical matters facing the nation.
In summary, Speaker Johnson’s swift response and the subsequent censure resolution bring to light the challenges of political decorum in a time of heightened tensions.