Houthi Militants Claim Attacks on US Warships Amid Rising Tensions

Houthi militants located in Yemen have asserted responsibility for recent attacks targeting U.S. warships in the strategically significant Red Sea. This announcement marks a provocative escalation in the ongoing conflict, reflecting the broader geopolitical tensions in the region.

In an official statement released on Tuesday, the Houthi group declared that they executed strikes against the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier, alongside multiple U.S. warships. The declaration was highlighted in a report by Jerusalem Post.

Drone Strikes Target US and Israeli Interests

On Wednesday morning, the Houthis stated they had utilized drones to target U.S. naval vessels and specific locations associated with Israeli military activities. This strategy underscores the group’s intent to reinforce its positioning in the face of perceived threats from the U.S. and its allies.

Fox News Digital has sought comments regarding these claims from the Department of Defense; however, responses have not yet been forthcoming.

Retaliation Claims Lacking Evidence

The Houthi faction previously asserted that their attacks against the Truman and its accompanying warships were retaliatory responses to escalated U.S. military actions in Yemen. Nonetheless, the group has yet to provide tangible evidence supporting these claims of retaliation.

In a related development, the U.S. military intercepted several Houthi drones shortly before the claims surfaced, indicating a proactive defense against potential threats.

Potential Military Action and Security Breaches

These developments unfold amid discussions among several Trump administration officials regarding potential military actions against the Houthis. A critical moment occurred when an encrypted messaging group on the Signal app mistakenly included Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of The Atlantic.

Goldberg recounted receiving an invitation to join the group labeled “Houthi PC Small Group” on March 11, revealing that prominent figures such as National Security Advisor Michael Waltz were included in the chat. This group primarily discussed what emerged as plans for a military strike against the Houthis.

This incident has drawn widespread criticism as an apparent breach of national security, accentuating that senior officials are prohibited from deliberating sensitive military strategies outside designated secure environments.

Revelations from the Group Chat

Goldberg disclosed that around 18 individuals participated in the group, including prominent officials: Waltz, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

In the chat, officials reportedly discussed intricate details regarding military operations, including weaponry, potential targets, and operational timing. Goldberg made a journalistic decision not to publish sensitive information that could jeopardize national security, recognizing the risks associated with disclosing such information.

Concerns Over National Security and Accountability

Notably, Ratcliffe inadvertently mentioned the identity of a CIA agent within the Signal chat, raising alarms about operational security. The White House has acknowledged the authenticity of the group chat, but some administration officials, including Hegseth, have attempted to minimize the implications while casting doubt on Goldberg’s integrity as a reporter.

Hegseth publicly dismissed the situation, stating that the characterizations of the chat were exaggerated. He insisted that the conversations did not involve the drafting of military plans, emphasizing that the context has been misrepresented.

In a heated exchange, Hegseth characterized Goldberg as a