Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The FBI has had a complex relationship with public messaging over the years. As a former supervisory special agent and deputy unit chief in the National Press Office, I witnessed firsthand how effective communication can either build public trust or undermine it. This dynamic hinges on timing, tone, and transparency.
Historically, the Bureau treated social media as a legal document—formal, cautious, and often too slow to adapt. Communication was tightly controlled, devoid of emotional appeal. This approach stemmed from a deep-seated aversion to risk, understandable in the law enforcement context. Yet, this reluctance resulted in a significant communication void.
However, the landscape has changed. Under current leadership, the FBI now confidently engages in the digital space. Social media platforms highlight the essential work of FBI agents who protect Americans daily. From combatting cybercriminals to preventing domestic terrorism and rescuing kidnapped children, the messaging is faster and more relatable. It focuses less on bureaucracy and more on mission-driven narratives. This pivotal shift began in 2008 with the creation of the @FBIPressOffice on Twitter.
At that time, the FBI had minimal online presence. The rapid news cycle demanded a proactive approach. A few of us in the Office of Public Affairs understood that if we did not start telling our own story, others would misrepresent it.
Our vision was straightforward: treat Twitter like community policing. Connect with the public not only during crises but also on ordinary days. This strategy enabled Americans to see the dedicated men and women behind the badge who work tirelessly behind the scenes.
Despite initial efforts, the FBI’s social media presence remained largely one-sided. The Bureau often communicated like a megaphone rather than engaging in genuine dialogue. Interaction with online comments proved impractical, and today, with the prevalence of trolls, misinformation, and coordinated attacks, direct engagement has become even more challenging.
Building trust cannot rely solely on formal press releases. It demands visibility, authenticity, and consistent outreach, even when it feels daunting.
Since my time leading communications efforts, the FBI’s digital voice has significantly transformed. The unified @FBI account now shares news updates, safety alerts, and exclusive behind-the-scenes content—an unthinkable evolution from previous approaches. This represents a significant step forward but is accompanied by credible risks.
In my experience, one guiding principle remained paramount: never compromise an ongoing case for the sake of a headline. Department of Justice policies were exact—never discuss active investigations or leak sensitive information, as these actions could jeopardize a fair trial.
Maintaining justice is always the priority. Numerous U.S. attorneys I collaborated with drove this point home: taint the jury pool, and you could derail a case before it steps foot in a courtroom.
Now, balancing transparency and preservation of justice has never been more challenging. In our fast-paced world, rumors and misinformation can circulate in an instant. Remaining silent risks eroding public trust, while excessive disclosure can jeopardize investigation integrity. Managing this tension demands experience, discipline, and sound judgment.
Critics may argue that the FBI’s new digital strategy is merely spin, and at times it may appear that way. Whenever messaging veers into self-promotion, it raises legitimate concerns. Nonetheless, effective modern communication has become essential. The Bureau must adapt while diligently safeguarding the integrity of its investigations.
Americans deserve to witness the authentic FBI, not just the high-ranking officials in Washington, but the dedicated agents, analysts, and professionals across the nation who rise daily to protect our freedoms. Most of these individuals did not join the Bureau for recognition. However, showcasing their efforts fosters public understanding and trust in the FBI’s mission.
In today’s world, building trust involves reaching audiences where they engage the most—often through their smartphones. While social media should complement traditional media channels, it cannot replace them. For the FBI to maintain credibility and connection, it must establish a presence across platforms. This engagement must exemplify the same ethical standards and commitment to justice that define the Bureau’s mission.
The FBI’s core mission remains unchanged: to protect the American public and uphold the Constitution. However, the battlefield has expanded. Law enforcement now faces not only physical threats but also the challenges of disinformation and public distrust.
In navigating this complex terrain, silence is no longer an option. The work of the FBI must resonate with the American people, ensuring that the agency operates with transparency and accountability.