Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

An associate professor at The University of New Mexico is expressing deep concerns about being compelled to teach a two-gender model, which she believes undermines scientific understanding of gender and sexuality.
Georgiann Davis, who specializes in gender studies, recently penned an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, raising questions about the implications of teaching that only male and female exist. In her article, titled ‘I’m an intersex professor. Am I supposed to lie by teaching only male and female?’, Davis argues that such an approach conflicts with the reality of intersex individuals.
In her op-ed, Davis references a viral video featuring a Texas A&M student challenging Professor Melissa McCoul on her teachings about ‘gender and sexuality’ within a classroom setting. The student questioned the legality of teaching concepts that diverge from the binary perspective on gender. The debate around gender ideology has intensified, particularly in light of recent legislative measures emphasizing a strict binary classification of gender.
McCoul had utilized a graphic, known as the ‘gender unicorn’, as part of her teaching materials, aimed at explaining the complexities of gender identity and sexuality. This visualization aims to illustrate diversity beyond a simplistic two-gender model.
The Texas A&M administration subsequently terminated McCoul’s employment, citing discrepancies between her course content and the official course description. Former university president Mark A. Welsh III commented on the controversy, revealing that key administrators had been removed due to their support of content inconsistent with the university’s official stance.
Davis voiced her apprehensions regarding potential repercussions she might face for presenting an honest portrayal of sexuality. She remarked, ‘As someone who also teaches in the Southwest, I find myself scared — scared of what consequences might follow if I teach well and honestly.’
The fear stems from the increasing prevalence of misinformation surrounding gender and sexuality, as public figures, including former President Donald Trump, have perpetuated a strictly binary view of gender.
Davis, who identifies as intersex having been born with atypical biological characteristics, articulated her dismay over the notion of lying to her students. ‘Should I deny that intersex people exist as a biological reality?’ she questioned in her op-ed. Davis highlighted her own experiences of being born with a vagina, internal testes, and XY chromosomes, underscoring that intersex identities are legitimate and scientifically recognized.
The Cleveland Clinic emphasizes that approximately 1 in 100 individuals in the United States are intersex, revealing a significant aspect of human diversity that contradicts strict binary classifications. Davis pointed out that denying this reality does not align with scientific principles.
Ethics of Teaching
Davis’s assertion that teaching only the existence of male and female negates truth raises broader ethical questions about educational practices in the current political climate. ‘This is why I’m scared to do my job,’ she stated. Presenting a binary view in class would require her to disregard the existence and reality of intersex individuals.
In a conversation with Fox News Digital, Davis reiterated her stance, stating that ‘it is a lie to teach there are two genders’. She emphasized that any competent biologist or medical professional would support this view, reinforcing her commitment to providing factual and accurate education to her students.
Davis articulated her refusal to allow political ideologies to dictate the way she educates her students. ‘I prefer facts,’ she stated. ‘I was born with a vagina and internal testes. That’s not an ideology. That’s reality.’
The discussions surrounding gender and sexuality are part of a larger societal conversation about inclusivity, identity, and the role of education. As educational institutions grapple with these turbulent discussions, the challenge lies in balancing diverse perspectives with scientific accuracy.
In the wake of increased scrutiny on academic content, the responsibility of educators to uphold scientific integrity and provide comprehensive education becomes more crucial than ever. Conversations about gender identity and diversity should encourage understanding rather than perpetuate fear and misunderstanding.
As the educational landscape evolves, the voices of educators like Georgiann Davis serve as important reminders of the complexities involved in teaching about gender and sexuality. It is essential to recognize the varying realities individuals face and to foster an environment where all identities are acknowledged and respected.