Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
An Iowa man has reached a settlement with his former employer following his dismissal for wearing t-shirts that displayed Bible verses during the company’s LGBTQ Pride Month celebrations. This case underscores ongoing tensions between religious beliefs and corporate diversity initiatives.
Cosby “Corey” Cunningham, a devout Christian, filed a religious discrimination lawsuit in federal court against Eaton Corp, a global management company, after his termination in August 2023. The lawsuit highlighted Cunningham’s claims that his firing stemmed directly from his religious expressions.
Background of the Case
Cunningham was employed by Eaton as a quality assurance manager since 2019. In this role, he was responsible for overseeing new product development in military and commercial aerospace sectors. His tenure was marked by Eaton’s increasing focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in promoting LGBTQ support within the workplace.
According to Cunningham’s lawsuit, he attended several DEI training sessions, during which he felt singled out for voicing disagreement over the use of preferred pronouns. This experience reportedly left him feeling marginalized in a company culture that he perceived as increasingly hostile toward his beliefs.
The Incident During Pride Month
On June 2, 2023, Eaton held a Pride Month ceremony, raising a Pride flag in front of its main building. Employees were encouraged to wear specific colors and supportive attire. In contrast to this initiative, Cunningham opted to wear t-shirts bearing biblical verses to express his sincerely held religious beliefs and to challenge the corporate narrative on LGBTQ pride.
Among the t-shirts he wore, one featured the verse from Proverbs 16:18, stating, “Pride goes before destruction, an arrogant spirit before a fall.” Another shirt proclaimed, “Taking back the rainbow — Genesis 9:13,” with the verse about the covenant between God and the earth displayed prominently.
Additionally, a third shirt read, “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble. James 4:6,” further emphasizing his stance against what he viewed as an imposition of ideological beliefs by his employer.
Confrontation with Human Resources
After wearing these t-shirts, Cunningham was invited to a meeting with Human Resources where he was informed his attire made some employees uncomfortable, with one individual describing it as inflammatory toward the LGBTQ community. The intimidation continued when Cunningham asked for written documentation regarding any policy he purportedly violated by wearing the shirts.
The lawsuit contends that during the meeting, Cunningham faced threats of termination. In response, he formally requested a religious accommodation to keep wearing his attire, but his request was denied. Following this, he expressed feeling attacked by Eaton for his beliefs in a subsequent letter to HR.
Termination and Lawsuit Filings
The situation escalated in the weeks that followed. Despite continued resistance, Cunningham was sent home on two occasions for refusing to stop wearing the t-shirts. Ultimately, he was fired on August 23, 2023, under the charge of violating Eaton’s Harassment-Free Policy.
In retaliation for his dismissal, Cunningham lodged formal complaints with both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Iowa Civil Rights Commission. He subsequently filed a lawsuit in federal court in August 2024, alleging that Eaton had engaged in unlawful religious discrimination.
Legal Proceedings and Settlement
According to reports from Cedar Rapids-based media, Eaton’s legal team argued that the company’s actions were legitimate, asserting that they did not constitute discrimination or retaliation. They claimed that Cunningham’s behavior warranted disciplinary action based on business needs.
This week, the case came to an unexpected resolution when Cunningham and Eaton reached a settlement agreement outside of court. The specifics of the settlement remain confidential, but the case was officially dismissed on May 20, as documented in court records.
A Balancing Act of Rights
The settlement reflects broader societal debates concerning the balance between religious expression and corporate policies aimed at fostering inclusivity. As workplaces continue to embrace diversity initiatives, instances like Cunningham’s highlight a pivotal juncture in navigating these complex issues.
While Cunningham’s case may provide some closure, it also raises questions about the implications for employees who hold differing beliefs in environments increasingly shaped by corporate identities and societal movements. The evolving landscape of workplace policies concerning personal expression and religious freedom remains a topic of significant importance as more organizations strive to strike the right balance.
As organizations reevaluate their policies, the need for respectful dialogue between differing viewpoints becomes crucial. Following this case, firms may be compelled to reassess their approach to religious expression amid celebrations and initiatives promoting diversity and inclusion.
