Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Justin Baldoni’s legal team has recently made serious allegations against actress Blake Lively amid a contentious legal battle surrounding the film It Ends With Us. According to documents filed on Wednesday, Baldoni alleges that Lively attempted to coerce her close friend Taylor Swift into publicly supporting her during this ongoing dispute.
In the newly filed court documents, Baldoni’s attorneys claimed that Lively threatened Swift over her support. This development comes as the tension escalates between the actors involved in the adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling novel.
Following these allegations, Lively’s legal representative, Mike Gottlieb, vehemently denied Baldoni’s claims, describing them as “categorically false.” He criticized Baldoni’s team for relying on anonymous sources, asserting that such claims were baseless and disconnected from reality.
Gottlieb stated, “We unequivocally deny all of these so-called allegations, which are cowardly sourced to supposed anonymous sources and completely untethered from reality. This is what we have come to expect from the Wayfarer parties’ lawyers, who appear to love nothing more than shooting first, without any evidence, and with no care for the people they are harming in the process.” This powerful rebuttal underscores the contentious atmosphere surrounding the case.
Simultaneously, Lively’s attorneys filed a motion to dismiss Baldoni’s accusations, labeling them as “baseless, unnecessary, improper and abusive.” They also argued that responding to these anonymous, unsupported claims should not be necessary.
Gottlieb added, “It is worth stating for the record, however, that each of the allegations in the Freedman Letter is unequivocally and demonstrably false. As a legal matter, the Freedman Letter is improper.” This legal dance highlights the stakes involved, as both sides prepare for a legal showdown.
Baldoni’s team solicited the court to issue a subpoena for Swift, arguing that acquiring her testimony is essential to the case. Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, contended that claims asserting the subpoena’s irrelevance misinterpret the situation. According to Freedman, an anonymous source hinted that Lively attempted to pressure Swift into deleting specific text messages.
In his statement, Freedman revealed that Lively’s legal team allegedly reached out to Swift’s representatives, demanding a public demonstration of support. He alleged that Lively’s team implied that failing to comply would result in the release of private text messages in their possession.
It’s important to note that Swift was recently subpoenaed as a witness in the Baldoni-Lively legal battle. Her representation has firmly stated that Swift’s only connection to the project is through the licensing of her song “My Tears Ricochet.” The pop star was not involved in any direct capacity with film production.
A spokesperson for Swift insisted, “Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie. She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions. She did not score the film. She never saw an edit or made any notes on the film. She did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release.” This clarification serves to distance Swift from the controversy while reinforcing her limited role in the film’s creation.
The spokesperson continued, emphasizing that Swift’s only involvement was permitting the use of her song, a common practice among artists. Swift’s representatives assert that the legal moves surrounding the subpoena are an attempt to incite media attention rather than focus on the factual elements of the case.
Baldoni and Lively collaborated on the romantic drama It Ends With Us, which debuted in August 2024. Following a marketing campaign filled with speculation of behind-the-scenes disputes, both parties initiated legal action against one another. In January, Baldoni filed a $400 million lawsuit, accusing Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, of civil extortion and defamation.
This lawsuit came after Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment during the film’s production. Baldoni has claimed that Lively’s accusations were made to restore her reputation amid fallout from the film’s promotional activities.
Moreover, Baldoni’s legal representatives alleged that Lively attempted to assert control over the film’s production. They claimed she used her friendship with Swift as leverage against Baldoni. The lawsuit details how during filming, Lively sought to revise a pivotal scene that Baldoni had reservations about. Ultimately, Baldoni reported feeling pressured into accepting Lively’s changes.
As this legal struggle unfolds, there is no indication that either side is willing to settle out of court. The case is set to progress to trial in a New York court in March 2026. Given the high stakes and the involvement of prominent figures, the case will likely stay in the public eye as it progresses.
As the situation continues to develop, many are left wondering how the intertwining narratives of celebrity relationships, legal disputes, and public perception will play out in the coming months. With such high-profile individuals involved, the outcome could very well resonate far beyond the courtroom.
This report reflects ongoing contributions and coverage of the case by multiple sources.