Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Karen Read’s retrial in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, commenced on Tuesday with intense drama and a contentious atmosphere. The proceedings quickly escalated, particularly after Judge Beverly Cannone dismissed jurors for the day amid a passionate hearing pertaining to late discovery violations.
During the opening statements, both the defense and prosecution presented starkly contrasting narratives regarding the events leading to O’Keefe’s death. Once the jury departed, Judge Cannone called for an additional hearing scheduled for Friday, during which she accused the defense of violating crucial orders related to reciprocal discovery.
Defense attorney Alan Jackson initiated his remarks by directly challenging the core of the prosecution’s argument, which claims that O’Keefe sustained fatal injuries after being struck by Read’s Lexus SUV during a nor’easter. Jackson emphatically asserted, “The evidence in this case will establish, above everything else, three points: there was no collision with John O’Keefe. There was no collision. There was no collision.”
Conversely, special prosecutor Hank Brennan painted a far more grave picture during his opening statement. He described Read as allegedly intoxicated and angry, asserting that she deliberately pressed the accelerator, hitting O’Keefe from behind, and then left him to succumb to severe head injuries and hypothermia on the cold ground.
The case’s outcome may depend significantly on whether two defense experts are permitted to testify regarding their assessments related to the incident.
Following the jury’s exit, lawyers engaged in a heated argument regarding whether expert analyses from the ARCCA crash-reconstruction firm should be included in the proceedings. These experts previously contradicted the prosecution’s timeline in the initial trial.
Brennan urged the court to exclude the ARCCA experts, claiming that they had uncovered new conclusions that his team could not adequately prepare for due to late disclosures. He expressed concern over the integrity of the process and the implications for a fair trial.
Meanwhile, defense attorney Robert Alessi countered that the prosecution was primarily responsible for delays, citing that changes to their own expert disclosures in March led to complications just weeks before jury selection was set to start on April 1.
Judge Cannone expressed her frustration over prior violations of reciprocal discovery obligations and determined that further clarity was needed before any experts could testify. As a result, she scheduled a voir dire hearing with the ARCCA experts for Friday morning. Notably, jurors will not be present during this session.
Grace Edwards, an Essex County trial attorney closely following the developments, reflected on the dramatic close of the day’s proceedings. She expressed concern, stating, “They still don’t have the sallyport video,” referencing the police surveillance footage from the moment Read’s SUV was taken into custody. “This feels harsh.”
Experts predict that the new testimony expected from the ARCCA team could pose challenges for the prosecution. Former NYPD inspector Paul Mauro stated, “She barely allowed this to begin with. She can’t be happy about this. Very bad news for the defense.”
Read’s demeanor outside the courthouse belied the tensions in the courtroom. Smiling at reporters, she voiced her confidence, saying, “I feel great. Today went well. We prepped hard, and I’m just proud of my team.” When asked about the contrasting styles of defense attorneys, she humorously remarked, “We don’t like reruns,” referencing a previous trial’s dialogue.
The first witness to take the stand was Timothy Nuttall, a paramedic who attended to O’Keefe shortly after the incident on January 29, 2022. Nuttall recounted that as emergency services attempted to administer CPR, Read repeatedly stated, “I hit him. I hit him. I hit him.”
However, during the cross-examination, Jackson skillfully challenged Nuttall’s recollection, emphasizing discrepancies between his current testimony and what he stated during Read’s initial trial last year. Jackson called attention to factually incorrect statements made by Nuttall regarding O’Keefe’s clothing and highlighted inconsistencies observed in dashcam footage taken by paramedics at the scene.
Nuttall appeared uneasy as Jackson probed his memory, ultimately reaffirming he heard Read say, “I hit him” multiple times. This exchange underscored the tension between the two legal teams as they fought for control over the narrative.
Another significant witness was Kerry Roberts, a close friend of O’Keefe, who spoke about her relationship with him and their families. On the morning of O’Keefe’s death, Roberts relayed that she was driving Read and another friend as they searched for him after realizing he was missing. Her testimony detailed a frantic moment when Read, excitedly recognizing O’Keefe, screamed from the back seat, demanding to be let out of the car.
Roberts recounted searching for the victim in a poorly lit area before discovering O’Keefe lying on the lawn. The judge recessed the court after her testimony, planning to continue with Roberts’ cross-examination when the proceedings resume on Wednesday morning.
This highly publicized trial is expected to last six to eight weeks, following an extensive jury selection process that took more than two weeks. Should Read be convicted of the primary charge, second-degree murder, she could face a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
The outcome of this complex case continues to draw public interest, as commentators speculate on the strategies and implications of the testimonies presented, shaping the narrative of a tragedy wrapped in legal drama.
