Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In September 2024, a tragic event unfolded in Letcher County, Kentucky, when former Sheriff Shawn “Mickey” Stines shot District Judge Kevin Mullins inside the judge’s chambers. This shocking incident, captured on surveillance footage, rattled the small community of Whitesburg and has drawn significant attention from true crime enthusiasts.
The roots of this disturbing saga trace back several years to allegations surrounding a former sheriff’s deputy. A civil lawsuit accused this deputy of raping a female defendant who was out on bond, and notably, it also listed Stines as a defendant.
Timeline of Troubling Events
In her civil lawsuit, Sabrina Adkins alleged that former Deputy Ben Fields coerced her into sexual acts while she was under home incarceration. According to court documents, Fields offered to remove Adkins’ GPS ankle monitor in exchange for sexual favors, which allegedly occurred multiple times in the chambers of Judge Mullins.
When Adkins ceased her compliance, she reportedly faced immediate arrest. Stines, identified as Fields’ direct supervisor, was accused in the lawsuit of failing to provide adequate training and oversight for his subordinate.
Attorney Ned Pillersdorf, representing Adkins, highlighted the systemic nature of the exploitation, stating that the courthouse was essentially running a brothel. He noted that Fields had directed Adkins to service others, indicating a wider pattern of abuse that may have involved additional women.
Adkins later testified that exchanging sexual favors for leniency within the county’s criminal justice system was a common practice, further implicating the culture of corruption within the courthouse.
As the fallout from these allegations continued, a security camera was installed in the judge’s chambers, a rare move prompted by increasing concerns over the situation.
Eventually, Fields faced multiple charges following the lawsuit, with counts including third-degree rape and tampering with a prisoner monitoring device. He ultimately pleaded guilty and received a seven-year prison sentence.
As the civil case progressed, Stines was deposed. His attorney reported a sharp decline in his mental health leading up to the deposition, describing Stines as paranoid and fearful for his family’s safety amidst the ongoing legal scrutiny.
On the day of the shooting, Stines reportedly expressed concerns about threats directed at his family and attempted multiple times to reach them before the tragic confrontation with Judge Mullins.
The Day of the Shooting
Witnesses recalled an unusual atmosphere on the day of the shooting. Stines had lunch with Mullins and other courthouse associates, during which he exhibited strange behavior, such as expressing doubts about his reelection prospects. This erratic demeanor raised alarms among those present.
After lunch, Stines and his friend Michael Clark delivered food to a homebound individual, a usual routine for Stines. However, when they arrived at the wrong address, his anxiety reportedly intensified. Following this incident, they returned to the courthouse.
Shortly thereafter, Stines entered Mullins’ office, where a cordial discussion took place. After approximately 12 minutes, he instructed others to leave before speaking privately with the judge for seven additional minutes.
During this private conversation, Stines allegedly locked the door and subsequently took out his weapon, aiming it at Mullins in an unprovoked act of violence. In a matter of moments, Stines pulled the trigger, claiming Mullins’ life.
Following the shooting, officers with the Kentucky State Police immediately investigated the incident. Their preliminary findings indicated that an argument preceded the shooting, leading to Stines being taken into custody without incident.
Legal Proceedings and Future Implications
In November 2024, a grand jury formally indicted Stines on charges of murder. The indictment outlined that Stines unlawfully killed Judge Mullins, an act that was both shocking and unprecedented within the community.
Stines’ defense attorney, Jeremy Bartley, has indicated plans to pursue an insanity defense, intending to introduce evidence concerning Stines’ mental state at the time of the incident. The defense may also point to emotional disturbances that could mitigate the charges against him.
This case has sparked widespread discussion about accountability and systemic issues within the law enforcement and judicial systems in Letcher County. Advocates for justice are particularly concerned about the implications of a courthouse culture that appears to have permitted and even fostered a cycle of abuse.
As the trial approaches, the focus will remain on both the events surrounding the tragedy and the broader implications for the community at large. The case serves as a grim reminder of the potential consequences of unchecked power and the importance of transparency and accountability in public office.
An Ongoing Conversation
The shocking events at Letcher County’s courthouse have opened up critical discussions regarding systemic abuse within law enforcement and the judicial system. The relationships between those in power and the individuals they govern are often fraught with complexities, especially when there are allegations of misconduct. As this case unfolds, it will not only provide answers about the specific violent act but also raise essential questions about how such tragedies can be prevented in the future. Communities must strive for a system where justice and accountability prevail, ensuring that the rights and dignity of all individuals, particularly the vulnerable, are fiercely protected.
