Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Colorado is now at the center of a significant legal battle following the enactment of a controversial law aimed at enhancing transgender protections. The legislation raises fundamental questions about free speech and parental rights.
Recently, Governor Jared Polis signed the Kelly Loving Act, which broadens the state’s anti-discrimination provisions regarding transgender individuals. This new law allows a person’s chosen name to be recognized as a legitimate form of gender expression under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act.
In response to the new legislation, the group Defending Education, representing organizations such as Do No Harm, The Colorado Parent Advocacy Network, and Protect Kids Colorado, has filed a lawsuit against the state. These groups are worried that the law could infringe upon their rights to free speech.
The lawsuit states, “The Act’s new definition of ‘gender expression’ is unconstitutionally overbroad.” It argues that this definition effectively punishes individuals for expressing viewpoints on contentious political topics, including gender ideology. This perspective falls directly under protections granted by the First Amendment.
Further legal concerns arise from the law’s implication that it restricts speech. The lawsuit argues that since the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act prohibits what it deems discriminative speech, parents and individuals could be penalized for publicly contesting changes in gender identity or naming.
In a declaration made to Fox News Digital, Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President of Defending Education, criticized the law for restricting the discussions parents and doctors can have, aiming to shield what she referred to as the state’s preferred gender beliefs.
Perry expressed disbelief concerning the ongoing challenges Colorado faces regarding its anti-discrimination laws in the Supreme Court. She highlighted that the state’s latest legislative move exemplifies a significant overreach of authority, stating, “Governor Polis has nevertheless signed another patently unconstitutional iteration.”
Defending Education is pursuing both a preliminary and permanent injunction against the law, citing violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments due to what they describe as unconstitutional language and enforced compelled speech.
Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, Chairman of Do No Harm, voiced strong opposition to what he views as an infringement on constitutional rights. He stated that limiting Americans’ freedom of expression for the sake of radical gender ideology is inappropriate. He anticipates that the judiciary will affirm the notion that the Constitution supersedes progressive influences.
Fox News Digital has reached out for a statement from the governor’s office regarding the lawsuit.
Public Reaction to the Kelly Loving Act
The Kelly Loving Act has faced criticism from conservative groups and parents across Colorado since its proposal in March. Critics have focused particularly on provisions within the legislation that suggest actions such as deadnaming and misgendering could be framed as forms of coercive control impacting parental custody.
Following significant backlash, lawmakers chose to amend the bill, removing contentious language regarding deadnaming and child custody. Despite these modifications, critiques of the law persist, particularly around its broad definitions.
Historical Context and Legal Ramifications
Colorado has found itself engrossed in a series of legal disputes concerning its anti-discrimination statutes in recent years. One notable case involved Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, who faced multiple lawsuits for refusing to create cakes for same-sex marriages and gender transitions based on his religious beliefs.
In a landmark 2023 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a graphic designer who declined to create wedding websites for same-sex couples, asserting her beliefs could not be overridden by state anti-discrimination laws.
The Broader Implications
This ongoing legal confrontation over the Kelly Loving Act signifies deeper societal divides about gender identity and parental rights. As the case unfolds, it raises critical questions about the balance between anti-discrimination efforts and the preservation of free speech. The potential outcomes of this lawsuit could influence not only Colorado’s legislative landscape but also shape precedent for similar laws nationwide.
As discussions about gender identity evolve, so too do the implications of this law on parental rights and free expression. Observers are left to ponder what the future holds for Colorado amid this growing legal controversy.
