Liberal Judge Leverages Sanctuary Sheriffs to Challenge Opponent in Key Wisconsin Supreme Court Race

In a contentious ad designed to position herself as a tough contender against crime, Susan Crawford, the Democratic candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court, has secured the endorsement of a local sheriff known for opposing federal immigration enforcement. This strategy serves to highlight what she frames as extremism in her opponent, Brad Schimel.

A Sheriff’s Endorsement

Dane County Sheriff Kalvin Barrett appears in a 15-second ad, asserting his support for Crawford while criticizing Schimel’s record. The ad portrays Schimel as dangerously extreme, accusing him of allowing rapists to evade justice due to a backlog of rape kit processing, a claim Schimel contests. The ad implies a broader narrative of safety versus alleged negligence.

Controversial Sanctuary Policies

Barrett’s policies have faced scrutiny over concerns they may be permissive towards crime, particularly in cases involving illegal immigrants. His office has a documented history of resisting cooperation with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. Earlier this year, Barrett withdrew from the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, which assists ICE in locating undocumented criminal immigrants.

This decision drew significant attention and praise from civil liberties organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union.

Barrett Rejects ICE Assistance

“At this point, we will no longer be taking part in the SCAAP grant program due to the recent change in administration and our commitment to the community’s interests in Dane County,” Barrett stated in a local news interview. His announcement signals a clear shift in local law enforcement approach to immigration enforcement.

Additionally, he has assured that his department will not engage in proactive immigration enforcement, which aligns with his commitment to sanctuary policies.

Local Crime and National Discussion

The ongoing national debate over immigration enforcement is reflected in Barrett’s decisions. ICE has categorized Dane County as non-cooperative in its efforts, especially after certain individuals suspected of immigration violations were released on bail even after committing various offenses, including violent crimes.

In 2024, two Republican congressmen from Wisconsin called for accountability after a suspected gang member linked to violent crimes was arrested in Dane County, violating local sanctuary policies.

Concerns Over Community Safety

Critics argue that sanctuary policies create a chasm in community safety. Matt O’Brien, an investigator with the Immigration Reform Law Institute, expressed concern that local policies undermine law enforcement efforts and public safety, stating that such jurisdictions can shield dangerous criminals from necessary federal enforcement measures.

This perspective illustrates a growing divide in the political dialogue surrounding law enforcement and immigration. O’Brien argues that officers who genuinely prioritize community safety would actively work against these policies.

The Role of Public Figures

Another figure featured in Crawford’s ad, former Dane County Sheriff David Mahoney, has also publicly opposed ICE raids, aligning himself with Barrett’s stance on immigration enforcement. This showcases a cohesive strategy among local Democratic figures to position themselves against their Republican opponents in the race.

The Stakes of the Supreme Court Race

Brad Schimel, who served as the state’s attorney general and currently sits as a Waukesha County judge, faces Crawford on April 1 in what is seen as a pivotal election. Despite the nonpartisan nature of Supreme Court races, Crawford has garnered the backing of several liberal organizations and political figures, including significant financial support from the Wisconsin Democratic Party.

In contrast, Schimel’s base includes over 80 Wisconsin sheriffs and support from prominent GOP donors. This race could shift the balance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, currently holding a 4-3 liberal majority, to a conservative-leaning majority that could influence state policies for years to come.

Political Implications for Wisconsin

The outcome of this race extends beyond judicial appointments; it will shape future legislative initiatives and could have lasting ramifications for both the Democratic and Republican parties within Wisconsin. Andrew Iverson, the executive director of the Wisconsin GOP, emphasized the stakes involved, framing the election as a battleground between community safety and liberal agendas.

“Our goal is to prevent Crawford from using her seat to promote policies aligned with her Democratic allies, which we believe threaten the core values of Wisconsin,” Iverson stated.

Schimel’s campaign spokesperson echoed this sentiment, accusing Crawford of adhering to a dangerous agenda funded by influential figures like George Soros.

A Community Divided

The community appears divided as both candidates present contrasting visions for law enforcement and public safety. While Crawford seeks to appeal to voters who prioritize civil rights and community engagement, Schimel positions himself as the protector of traditional values and stringent law enforcement.

The election on April 1 will not only determine the individual who occupies a key role in the Wisconsin Supreme Court but will also reveal voters’ stances on critical issues of crime, immigration, and community safety.

The battle for this judicial seat illustrates larger national conversations regarding immigration policy and local law enforcement, positioning the candidates in a wider political landscape fraught with implications for governance, law enforcement practices, and community relations.