Marjorie Taylor Greene Raises Concerns Over AI Regulation in Key Legislation

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a recent supporter of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed in the House, expressed deep concerns about a specific provision that would limit states’ ability to regulate artificial intelligence. In a statement on social media, Greene emphasized that had she known about this controversial measure, her vote would have been decidedly different.

AI Regulation Provision Sparks Controversy

The provision in question imposes a significant ten-year restriction on states, hindering their authority to regulate AI technologies. Greene’s alarm about this provision highlights a growing unease among lawmakers regarding the unchecked expansion of artificial intelligence. By enforcing such restrictions, the legislation effectively curtails state sovereignty over emergent technologies.

Greene pointed out in her post on X that she was unaware of the restrictive language included in the bill. She stated, “Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly opposed to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.” Her transparency underscores an important issue—the responsibility of lawmakers to be fully informed about the legislation they support.

The Implications of AI Regulation

The specific text of the provision reads, “Except as provided in paragraph (2), no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, any law or regulation of that State or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce.” This language raises significant questions regarding potential abuses and risks associated with unregulated AI technologies.

Greene further elaborated on her concerns, stating, “We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states’ hands is potentially dangerous. This needs to be stripped out in the Senate.” Her comments reflect a broader call for vigilance regarding the rapid advancements in technology and the need for effective oversight.

Political Backlash and Accountability

The response to Greene’s revelation has been mixed, with some commentators quick to criticize her for not reading the legislation thoroughly before casting her vote. Representative Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California, tweeted, “You have one job. To. Read. The. F[—]ing. Bill.” Such remarks underscore a sentiment growing among critics who believe that lawmakers should be fully informed to prevent oversight that can lead to significant legislative consequences.

Additionally, political commentator Dana Loesch remarked, “Maybe instead of doing this you should have read the bill,” pointing to the importance of scrutiny when it comes to legislative processes. The implications of this bill and others like it call for a careful examination of how rapidly advancing technology intersects with legislative authority.

Greene’s Stance on Federalism

In a subsequent call with Fox News Digital, Greene emphasized the importance of humility in leadership. She stated, “If I ever cease to be humble as a representative and willing to publicly admit that maybe I’ve made a mistake … then I shouldn’t be a representative.” This acknowledgment suggests a nuanced understanding of accountability among public officials.

Greene believes the stakes are far too high when it comes to regulatory powers over AI. She articulated her views strongly: “I should have been able to trust Republicans, that we wouldn’t be destroying federalism in the One Big Beautiful Bill. That was what I didn’t expect. Because, state rights, that’s federalism. And Republicans are focused on reducing federal government power and protecting state rights. However, this bill literally destroys state rights for 10 years … destroys federalism.”

A Call for Legislative Review

Predicting outcomes in the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence remains uncertain, and calls for responsible governance have never been more vital. Greene’s insistence on revising the AI provision reflects a broader concern shared by various lawmakers who advocate for a balanced approach to technology regulation.

As the One Big Beautiful Bill Act heads to the Senate for potential amendments, Greene warned that she would not support the legislation unless the AI provisions are removed. Her commitment to safeguarding state powers over technological governance aims to resonate with citizens who prioritize local control over federal directives.

Elon Musk’s Critique of the Legislation

In the wider context of this legislative debate, prominent figures like Elon Musk have also voiced their discontent with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Musk referred to the bill as a “disgusting abomination” on social media, echoing Greene’s concerns regarding potential overreach and unchecked spending practices within Congress.

Ultimately, the discussion surrounding the One Big Beautiful Bill and its AI provisions touches on critical themes of governance, accountability, and foresight in policy-making. As technology continues to advance at an unprecedented rate, lawmakers must remain vigilant and proactive in crafting legislation that not only addresses present concerns but also anticipates future challenges.

Moving Forward

As the narrative surrounding this legislation unfolds, it is clear that dialogues around the regulation of AI must include diverse perspectives. Greene’s experience serves as a reminder of the need for thorough legislative review and the importance of representatives standing firmly in defense of their constituents’ rights. The implications of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act may set the tone for future discussions on technology regulation and federal authority over state governance.