Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
As the deadline for obtaining a REAL ID approaches on May 7, married women across the United States are reporting significant obstacles in securing this essential travel documentation.
The primary challenge many face is proving their name change after marriage, often without the original marriage certificate required to authenticate that change.
An example of this struggle can be seen in the case of Dorothy Ballone, a nonagenarian from Rochester, New York. Ballone has navigated a complicated journey to secure her original marriage certificate, which dates back 67 years.
Since being denied on her first visit to the New York Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) earlier this year, she has been diligently trying to obtain the required documents.
Ballone told Fox News Digital that she prepared a comprehensive array of documentation for her visit, including her Social Security card, birth certificate, utility bills, bank statements, and a copy of her marriage license from August 19, 1958.
The marriage license copy had been certified to confirm it was an accurate reproduction. However, during her DMV appointment, she encountered an unexpected setback.
When she placed all her papers on the counter, a clerk examined the marriage license copy and stated, “I can’t accept this.” Perplexed, Ballone questioned, “Why not?” to which the clerk responded that only the original document would suffice.
Following this encounter, Ballone was advised to contact her church to retrieve the original marriage certificate. After reaching out to the church in East Rochester, she learned they did not retain marriage licenses from that time period.
This prompted her to embark on an exhaustive search for her original marriage license, reaching out to clerks’ offices, local government officials, and even the Diocese of Rochester.
Eventually, the city of Rochester claimed they located the original document and sent it to her. However, when Ballone presented this certified document, she encountered yet another roadblock in her quest for a REAL ID.
Despite having lived under her married name for decades and possessing a driver’s license displaying that name, Ballone’s application was still rejected until she could present the official marriage document.
Ballone’s experience is not unique. She shared that two neighbors are facing similar challenges in locating their original marriage licenses, indicating that this has become a widespread issue.
Eager to understand how others are navigating this process, Fox News Digital spoke with several travelers at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., just a week before the deadline.
Alicia, a stay-at-home mother from Minneapolis, echoed Ballone’s sentiments regarding the struggles of acquiring a REAL ID due to her name change. She explained that, as a mother without a regular paycheck, gathering the final necessary documents proved challenging.
Alicia recounted, “I went one time, and then I had to go back a second time because I was missing our marriage certificate due to my name change. This process has been a little more complicated for me, especially with a baby in tow.”
With the enforcement deadline fast approaching, these women feel the pressure of the ticking clock as they race to secure the documentation necessary for air travel.
In light of these challenges, Fox News Digital reached out to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for clarification on this matter. A TSA spokesperson remarked that documentation requirements vary by state, urging those faces issues to contact their respective state authorities.
Given the scrutiny and difficulties surrounding the REAL ID application process, some are advocating for clearer protocols to aid individuals with name changes stemming from marriage. The frustration that has emerged highlights a need for systemic changes in documentation requirements, ensuring that all individuals, particularly married women, do not encounter undue hardship.
This situation for married women illustrates a broader issue regarding the complexities of vital document retention and accessibility, particularly for older generations. With a community of potentially millions of women affected, awareness and reform could help alleviate these unnecessary burdens.
As states continue implementing these stringent identification requirements, it is vital that they consider the practical implications for citizens. Those currently navigating similar challenges can only hope for resolutions that are both timely and understanding of their diverse circumstances.