Mel Gibson Critiques California Leaders Amid Ongoing Civil Unrest

Actor Mel Gibson has sharply criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass for their management of recent protests that led to escalations of violence in Los Angeles. Gibson, known for his outspoken views, voiced his concerns during an appearance on the “Arroyo Grande” podcast hosted by Fox News contributor Raymond Arroyo.

At 69 years old, Gibson previously condemned both leaders for their perceived inadequacies in dealing with the devastating Palisades and Eaton fires that destroyed parts of Southern California earlier this year. His latest comments come as Los Angeles grapples with what he describes as rampant lawlessness and civil unrest.

Government Response Under Fire

During his discussion, Gibson expressed frustration relating to local government’s handling of the protests. “Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass have shown incompetence and poor leadership during the Los Angeles wildfires,” he commented.

He went on to state that the situation during these protests highlighted their inability to respond effectively to crises. “Whether it’s sheer incompetence or outright malevolence, the reality is stark,” Gibson reflected, emphasizing that the state’s current turmoil warrants serious concern.

Calls for Accountability

Gibson passionately appealed to fellow residents of Los Angeles, questioning how Newsom and Bass continue to maintain their positions in office amid their challenges. “How much longer will we tolerate their destructive decision-making masquerading as leadership?” he asked.

The actor called for the community to reclaim its power and restore competent leadership dedicated to protecting public welfare. He insists, “It’s time to take back our community and our state.”

Background on Recent Events

In January, Gibson lost his home in the Palisades Fire, which erupted on January 7, a tragedy that deeply affected him and spurred his advocacy for improvements in California’s governance. Following the fires, he joined the movement to recall Governor Newsom, advocating for accountability regarding the management of state resources and emergency responses.

Regarding the ongoing protests, which initially began in response to policies enforced by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the situation in Los Angeles quickly escalated, leading to widespread rioting and theft just last weekend. In response to the chaos, President Trump approved the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and an additional 7,000 Marines to the city, marking a significant federal intervention.

Federal Intervention and Local Resistance

In an unprecedented move, Trump federalized California’s National Guard without the governor’s request, making it the first such action in 60 years. Governor Newsom has actively sought legal recourse to challenge this order. He has taken a strong stand against Trump’s decision, which he believes undermines local authority.

Legal Developments

After a federal district court judge ruled against Trump’s order, stating that it was illegal, a federal appeals court temporarily stayed this ruling, meaning control of the National Guard remained with the president for the time being. A crucial hearing is scheduled for the upcoming Tuesday, which may further clarify this complicated legal situation.

Community Concerns

Both Newsom and Bass have faced intense scrutiny for their responses to the unrest, especially considering the criticism they have received from figures like Gibson. They have expressed their support for peaceful protests and highlighted the need to protect immigrant communities during the civil unrest.

More recently, Mayor Bass implemented a curfew in parts of downtown Los Angeles, aiming to restore order as tensions continued to mount.

The Future of California Leadership

As the political landscape in California evolves, Newsom, who is currently in his second term, has confirmed he will not seek reelection in 2026. Meanwhile, Mayor Bass has announced her intention to run again in the upcoming election cycle. The dynamic nature of California’s political framework continues to raise questions about accountability, leadership effectiveness, and the state’s direction.

Through all this turmoil, Gibson’s comments highlight a broader concern shared by many Californians about their leaders’ ability to safeguard their communities and respond effectively to emergencies.

As Los Angeles navigates these complex issues, the push for competent leadership remains a priority for residents. While Gibson’s statements resonate with many, they also signify an urgent call for change in how local governance approaches crisis management.