Milwaukee Man Allegedly Frames Immigrant in Trump Threat Plot

Milwaukee Man Allegedly Frames Immigrant in Trump Threat Plot

A man from Milwaukee has been accused of forging a letter that threatened the life of President Donald Trump. This alleged act aimed to facilitate the deportation of another man, effectively silencing him before he could testify in a criminal case.

Charges Against Demetric D. Scott

Demetric D. Scott now faces multiple charges, including witness intimidation. He is accused of impersonating Ramón Morales-Reyes, a 54-year-old immigrant, while crafting the menacing letter. The unfolding legal drama raises significant questions about the motivations behind Scott’s alleged actions.

Background of Ramón Morales-Reyes

Ramón Morales-Reyes is identified as an illegal immigrant with a troubling criminal history, including felony hit-and-run incidents, property damage, and domestic abuse. His past has drawn the attention of federal authorities, complicating his current situation.

Threatening Letter Details

On May 21, a series of handwritten notes threatening President Trump and mentioning plans to blow up the White House were received by the Wisconsin Attorney General’s Office and local law enforcement. The criminal complaint details how the letters contained statements reflecting anger towards the current administration.

One noteworthy excerpt from the letter suggests deep-seated frustrations: “We are tired of this president messing with us Mexicans. We have done more for this country than you white people— you have been deporting my family, and I think it’s time that Donald J. Trump gets what he has coming to him.” This alarming sentiment underscores the potential volatility of public emotions regarding immigration policies.

Implications of the Investigation

The letters were not identical in content, but all featured return addresses connected to Morales-Reyes. However, investigators noted that Morales-Reyes struggles with English, raising questions about his ability to have authored the letters.

In a significant twist, Morales-Reyes pointed fingers at Scott, alleging that Scott was the only person who could want him in trouble, as he had been robbed by Scott previously. This statement illustrates the complicated dynamics at play in this case.

Evidence Collected from Scott’s Jail Cell

On May 30, police executed a search warrant in Scott’s jail cell. During this operation, investigators unearthed a blue pen along with a note asking for the address of the Wisconsin Attorney General’s Office. In addition, an envelope containing the address and phone number of Milwaukee ICE was found hidden under Scott’s bed.

Reactions from Legal Representatives

Kime Abduli, the attorney representing Morales-Reyes, expressed relief that his client is clearing his name. Abduli remarked, “I’m just glad that they have identified who it was or have a better sense of who it was and that Ramon is being cleared of any involvement in this.” This statement reflects a significant shift in the narrative as Scott is now the focal point of the allegations.

Ongoing Investigation and Legal Consequences

The investigation remains active as authorities probe the full extent of Scott’s actions. Following Morales-Reyes’s arrest and potential deportation, Scott reportedly stated in a phone call that Morales-Reyes “got what he deserved.” Such comments raise further questions about Scott’s mindset and intentions.

Status of Ramón Morales-Reyes

Currently, Morales-Reyes is being held at Dodge County Jail, facing threats of deportation. Reports indicate that a court appearance is set for June 4. The legal proceedings against both individuals involved are expected to draw continued public interest, particularly in relation to the broader immigration debate.

Broader Implications

This case sheds light on critical issues surrounding immigration and the legal system’s handling of threats against public officials. With escalating tensions surrounding immigration policy in the United States, this incident underscores how personal grievances can have far-reaching implications. As the situation develops, it will likely resonate with diverse audiences, highlighting the intricate web of immigration law and personal accountability.

The story showcases the complexities of an individual’s struggle within a larger national narrative. It also prompts critical discussions about the responsibility of authorities to address such threats effectively, ensuring the safety and security of all citizens.

This report was informed by the ongoing investigation and contributions from various journalistic sources.