Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Representative Nancy Mace, R-S.C., Takes a Stand Against Clemson University’s Gender Identity Menu
Representative Nancy Mace is once again in the spotlight, this time for her strong opposition to Clemson University’s recent inclusion of 15 gender identities in a health services form. Mace has been vocal about her stance on maintaining traditional definitions of gender, emphasizing biological distinctions.
In a passionate video shared on social media, Mace criticized Clemson’s health portal, highlighting terms such as “genderqueer,” “two-spirit,” “cis female,” and “cis male.” She conveyed her surprise at learning about this development from social media rather than through official communication channels.
“Hey everyone, just learned this morning from Libs of TikTok, not from your state legislature, that Clemson University in South Carolina has 15 genders on one of their applications,” Mace stated in her video. “We want to ensure South Carolina is following science and not some radical, woke, leftist, lunatic ideology. Not on my watch.”
Mace Takes Action Following Controversy
Following her initial critique, Mace did not merely vent her frustrations online. She promptly left a voicemail and sent a text message to Clemson President Jim Clements seeking clarification on the matter. Mace proclaimed, “Since there are only two genders, I just had this issue with USC, and I would like to make sure that you guys are following suit.”
The controversial dropdown menu, highlighted first by Libs of TikTok, allowed students to identify from a list of 15 different gender identities. Mace’s vocalization of her concerns reflects a larger narrative in American society surrounding gender identity and expression.
Clemson University Responds to the Allegations
In response to the backlash, Clemson University clarified its position through communications with Fox News Digital. The university emphasized that it does not feature this type of gender identity menu within its housing application system. Instead, they acknowledged that the menu originated in an external vendor’s health services portal. Clemson indicated that the form was optional and has now been removed, affirming that they are consulting medical professionals to ascertain the necessary information for health care.
Mace firmly articulated her stance, arguing that state universities should reflect only two genders — male and female — if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer funding. She declared, “If it were me and Clemson University had 15 genders, they would not get a dime in the state of South Carolina.”
Navigating the Gender Identity Debate
In her video, Mace took a particularly strong stance against the term “cis,” referring to it as a slur. She asserted, “Women are women, men are men.” Mace’s comments reflect a broader tension surrounding gender identity, highlighting the ongoing national conversation about the definitions and implications of gender in society.
This recent incident is not Mace’s first venture into the contentious terrain of gender issues. She previously garnered attention for opposing Representative Sarah McBride, D-Del., a transgender woman’s access to women’s restrooms in the Capitol. Mace’s continuous push to safeguard what she defines as women’s spaces has elicted considerable public response.
Following threats and backlash resulting from her advocacy, Mace emphatically stated on social media, “All the violence and threats keep proving our point. Women deserve to be safe. Your threats will not stop my fight for women! Not now, not ever.” This steadfast dedication emphasizes her commitment to her constituents and her stance in the ongoing gender discourse.
Recent Personal Incidents
In addition to her political battles, Mace has faced personal challenges related to her public persona. Last year, Mace reported being physically accosted on Capitol grounds, leading to the arrest of a 33-year-old Illinois man. This incident underscored the volatile nature of the gender identity debate in the public arena.
Mace also holds the distinction of being the first woman to graduate from the Citadel, an accomplishment that she often highlights as part of her political narrative and advocacy for women. Her journey reflects a commitment not only to her party but also to women’s rights within the context of evolving societal norms.
The representative’s office did not provide immediate comments to Fox News Digital about the unfolding situation at Clemson University. As the conversation around gender identity continues to evolve, Mace’s positions will likely remain in the spotlight, making her a pivotal figure in the political landscape.
Where Do We Go From Here?
The incident at Clemson University offers a glimpse into a larger societal debate about gender identity. As universities across the country grapple with issues of inclusion and representation, the implications of these discussions resonate deeply with Americans from all walks of life. The future of gender identity discourse remains uncertain, yet it undoubtedly will continue to challenge traditional definitions and expectations.
As lawmakers and citizens engage in this crucial dialogue, the balance between educational inclusivity and maintaining established biological definitions will likely remain a contentious issue. Representative Nancy Mace’s actions exemplify the fervor surrounding this topic, highlighting the intersection of politics, education, and social identity in contemporary America.
