Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Naomi Biden, the granddaughter of President Joe Biden, has sharply criticized a newly released book that assesses her grandfather’s time in office, describing it as mere ‘political fairy smut.’ Her remarks come in response to the publication of ‘Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,’ authored by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson.
In a passionate review, Naomi Biden expressed her discontent, stating, ‘Just read a copy of this silly book, and if anyone is curious for a review from someone who lived it first-hand: this book is political fairy smut for the permanent, professional chattering class. The ones who rarely enter the arena, but profit from the spectacle of those that do. Put simply, it amounts to a bunch of unoriginal, uninspired lies written by irresponsible self-promoting journalists out to make a quick buck.’
Naomi Biden elaborated on her feelings regarding the book’s depiction of her grandfather. She criticized the reliance on unnamed, anonymous sources, implying that this strategy fosters a self-serving narrative that evades accountability for present-day challenges. She stated, ‘It relies on unnamed, anonymous sources pushing a self-serving false narrative that absolves them of any responsibility for our current national nightmare. All of this at the expense of a man so completely good and honest that it is impossible for these people to ever understand the why or how of it all.’
She expressed her belief that genuine stories about her grandfather will eventually be shared, adding, ‘There are real stories to be told, and one day they will be. I suspect history will reward the truth.’
‘Original Sin’ was published on Tuesday, shedding light on aspects of President Biden’s health and leadership that have raised concerns among political analysts and aides. Recently, the former president’s office announced that Joe Biden was diagnosed with a serious form of prostate cancer.
Excerpts from the book indicated that Biden’s aides privately worried about his health, discussing the potential necessity of a wheelchair if he were to be re-elected in the upcoming 2024 election. This concern resonates amid reports of Biden’s physical struggles that became evident during his second term.
One chilling excerpt noted, ‘Biden’s physical deterioration — most apparent in his halting walk — had become so severe that there were internal discussions about putting the president in a wheelchair, but they couldn’t do so until after the election.’ It also included a statement from his physician, Kevin O’Connor, who cautioned, ‘Given Biden’s age, if he had another bad fall, a wheelchair might be necessary for what could be a difficult recovery.’
Additionally, the authors described an incident where President Biden reportedly failed to recognize actor George Clooney during a prominent fundraising event, a situation that fueled speculation about his declining cognitive abilities.
The book suggests that the push for Biden to withdraw from the race began escalating following a disheartening debate performance against former President Trump last June. This event reportedly sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party, prompting leaders to reconsider their support for Biden’s 2024 campaign.
David Plouffe, a senior advisor to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2024 campaign, was quoted in the book, pointing fingers at President Biden for the challenges faced by the campaign. Plouffe bluntly stated, ‘He totally f—ed us.’ These comments reveal the growing anxiety among Democrats regarding Biden’s viability as a candidate.
Representatives of the authors, Tapper and Thompson, have not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the intense criticism their book has received. Naomi Biden’s outspoken opposition signifies a broader concern about media narratives that may ignore the complexities and nuances of political figures.
In an era increasingly defined by polarized opinions and sensational journalism, Naomi Biden’s defense of her grandfather serves as a reminder of the profound impact that responsible reporting can have on public perception. It emphasizes the importance of truthful storytelling versus narratives that rely on conjecture and sensationalism.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, so too will the discussions surrounding President Biden’s legacy. Naomi Biden’s reflections highlight the emotional toll of individual narratives amid the broader political discourse. Her plea for clarity reflects a desire for genuine narratives to emerge—the kind that honors the life and service of her grandfather.
The straightforward yet intricate nature of political legacies demands careful examination, leaving the door open for future perspectives that might ultimately shape how history remembers President Joe Biden.