Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The National Fraternal Order of Police, the largest police union in the United States, has expressed strong disapproval of Chicago’s decision to prevent local officers from assisting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents during a protest. The organization labeled this action as “shocking” and a failure to uphold the fundamental duty of law enforcement to protect all officers in jeopardy.
Union leaders, including Patrick Yoes, the National FOP President, and Chris Southwood, the President of the Illinois State FOP, voiced their concerns after reports surfaced indicating that the Chicago Police Department’s chief of patrol instructed officers not to help ICE agents who found themselves encircled by demonstrators on Saturday.
Yoes stated, “Details are still emerging, but it appears that officers from the Chicago Police Department were ordered not to assist a group of ICE agents while they were physically threatened by what appeared to be an angry mob. Let me be clear, both the National FOP and the Illinois FOP firmly believe that when an officer calls for assistance, you respond without hesitation.”
The union leaders highlighted that this directive undermines a core principle of law enforcement, which is the expectation that officers come to the aid of their colleagues in distress.
The Illinois Trust Act, which limits local police collaboration with federal immigration enforcement, played a significant role in this situation. The FOP asserted that such regulations foster an environment of distrust and create a rift between local and federal law enforcement agencies, especially in cities like Chicago that have adopted sanctuary policies.
Furthermore, recent statistics from the Department of Homeland Security reveal a staggering 1,000 percent increase in violence directed at ICE agents since January. This alarming trend emphasizes the urgency of providing robust support to law enforcement personnel engaged in immigration enforcement operations.
Southwood characterized the alleged directive as a dangerous precedent for law enforcement, stating, “The unwritten rule in law enforcement is that we respond to calls from officers in distress. What would have transpired if Chicago police officers were under threat and nearby federal agencies were instructed not to help? Disagreement on immigration enforcement should not impede officers from providing assistance during a crisis.”
Yoes supported Southwood’s perspective, emphasizing the need for solidarity among law enforcement officers. He urged Chicago officials to reaffirm their commitment to ensuring that any officer requesting assistance receives prompt help from their fellow colleagues.
Yoes remarked, “The National FOP and our members at the Illinois FOP unequivocally condemn these actions. We call upon Chicago officials to guarantee that every law enforcement officer can expect their brothers and sisters in law enforcement to respond quickly in times of need.”
The controversy intensified following a Fox News report that revealed Chicago police were allegedly instructed not to assist in a situation where Border Patrol agents urgently sought help after being surrounded and threatened during a ramming incident. Visioning a scene rife with tension, Chicago police officers were reportedly told not to respond, as federal agents were well aware of the escalating danger.
Fox News obtained a computer-aided dispatch message from the chief of patrol that directed Chicago police not to engage in the emergency call concerning the ramming incident in the city. This incident involved an armed woman being shot, leaving federal agents trapped during a chaotic situation.
In a statement released on Sunday, the Chicago Police Department disputed allegations that officers failed to respond to the call for assistance. The department claimed they arrived at the scene to ensure public safety and to manage traffic control around the incident.
The department stated, “To clarify misinformation currently circulating, CPD officers did indeed respond to the shooting scene involving federal authorities on Saturday to maintain public safety and traffic control.” The department added that federal authorities are leading the investigation into the ramming incident, affirming their presence to ensure the safety of all involved. Additionally, officers returned to respond to another incident involving federal personnel later that day.
The Chicago Police Department reiterated its commitment to responding to individuals under threat of physical harm, stating, “The Chicago Police Department will always respond to anyone who is being attacked or is under the threat of physical harm. For incidents involving federal immigration enforcement, CPD supervisors will assess the situation and determine the appropriate response in line with City law.”
However, two experienced Chicago police sources voiced strong objections to the department’s claims, labeling the official statement as an attempt to protect their image. As reported, a seasoned source remarked, “That is not true,” asserting that audio recordings from dispatch confirm the officers’ exclusion from the incident. They maintained that although officers initially arrived on the scene, they left due to the aforementioned order.
This incident stirs significant concerns regarding the relationships and duties of local law enforcement in relation to federal agencies, particularly as tensions escalate within enforcement operations in urban areas.
The unfolding circumstances continue to raise questions about how local directives impact the safety of law enforcement officers and the operational integrity of agencies like ICE, culminating in heightened anticipation of how these policies will evolve moving forward.
