New Book Uncovers Biden’s Advisers Decided Against Cognitive Test Amid Age Concerns

New Book Uncovers Biden’s Advisers Decided Against Cognitive Test Amid Age Concerns

A recent publication has brought to light that advisors to former President Joe Biden opted not to have him undergo a cognitive test in February 2024. Concerns about how such a test might further highlight his age played a significant role in this decision. The revelation was reported by The New York Times on Sunday.

The book, titled “2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,” is authored by notable journalists Tyler Pager, Josh Dawsey, and Isaac Arnsdorf. It is set to be released in July and offers an in-depth look at the tumultuous events leading up to the 2024 presidential election.

Debate Over Cognitive Testing

Within the pages of this book, the authors detail discussions among Biden’s closest aides regarding the prospect of a cognitive test. Their primary goal was to alleviate rising concerns about the president’s age. Reports confirmed that aides were confident in Biden’s potential performance on the test.

The New York Times revealed that Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s longtime physician, assured aides he would not consider the president’s political status while treating him. This statement further complicated the debate surrounding the need for a cognitive evaluation.

Context of the Decision

The discussions concerning the cognitive test took place shortly before a crucial June debate against President Donald Trump and mere weeks prior to Biden’s annual physical examination at the White House. This timeframe marked a period of intense scrutiny over Biden’s capabilities as the 2024 election approached.

During February, multiple significant events impacted the political landscape, including the release of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report. In this report, Hur characterized Biden as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” adding to concerns about the president’s handling of classified documents.

Internal Communication and Tension

The book also references a conversation between Ron Klain, Biden’s former chief of staff, and David Axelrod, a prominent Obama aide. Klain reportedly contacted Axelrod after a comment prompted by a June 2022 New York Times report. Axelrod had stated that Biden would be closer to 90 than 80 by the end of a potential second term, raising alarms within the Democratic Party.

According to the Times, Klain expressed frustration during the call, seeking clarification on why Axelrod would cast doubt on a sitting Democratic president preparing for re-election. He argued that with no viable alternative ready to lead, the party could not afford to fuel skepticism.

Addressing Potential Decline

Further insights into Biden’s condition emerged from another recent publication. This book disclosed that Klain described Biden as “fatigued, befuddled, and disengaged” leading up to his debate with Trump. Klain had taken on the role of preparing Biden for the debate after stepping down from his position in the White House.

During an encounter at Aspen Lodge, where Klain met with Biden, he noted a concerning level of exhaustion and disorientation. Klain observed that the president seemed unaware of critical developments within his own campaign, culminating with Biden taking a break halfway through their meeting to relax by the pool.

The Broader Implications

The public’s perception of Biden’s cognitive abilities has become a contentious topic, particularly as he seeks re-election. The discussions among his advisors reflect the significant concern regarding age and capability in the political arena. Such considerations could potentially influence voter perceptions as the election draws closer.

Furthermore, the backdrop of ongoing media scrutiny sheds light on how perception shapes public trust in political leaders. There is an ongoing dialogue about the responsibilities of media outlets and analysts in framing such narratives, particularly in relation to Democratic candidates.

Anticipation for Election Season

As the 2024 presidential campaign unfolds, the dynamics surrounding Joe Biden’s administration and his age will remain pivotal issues. Insights from publications and ongoing revelations will undoubtedly play a role in shaping voter opinions and expectations.

The upcoming election not only represents a critical juncture for Biden but also poses significant implications for the Democratic Party and its strategies. Voter engagement and response will likely reflect concerns shared by many about age and capability in leadership roles.

As the political landscape continues to shift, it is crucial for both supporters and critics to remain informed. The discussion surrounding cognitive testing and age is set to be a focal point from now until the election.

A representative for Biden did not immediately respond to requests for further comment, leaving speculation to thrive as election day approaches.