Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
New allegations have emerged against three brothers implicated in a long-running scheme to traffic women for sex. Federal authorities revealed additional charges this week as they seek to build a robust case against the high-profile real estate moguls.
Tal Alexander, Oren Alexander, and Alon Alexander now face serious charges including conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, inducement to travel for unlawful sexual activity, and multiple counts of sex trafficking involving force, fraud, or coercion. These accusations arose from a federal superseding indictment filed against them.
The latest indictment reveals that Tal Alexander bears extra charges of sex trafficking and inducement, while his brothers, Alon and Oren, have been charged with aggravated sexual abuse. Court documents indicate that the charges stem from claims made by at least six new victims, including one minor.
The brothers have pleaded not guilty to all counts, increasing the total number of charges in this case to ten.
Kelly Hyman, a trial attorney and host of the true-crime podcast “Unresolved: The Diddy Cases,” emphasized the severity of these federal charges. She explained that federal prosecutions often entail harsher penalties compared to state offenses, especially when they involve sex trafficking and aggravated sexual abuse.
According to federal prosecutors, the Alexander brothers lured numerous women under false pretenses, offering promises of luxury travel and lavish experiences. They allegedly conspired for over a decade, exploiting their status in the real estate industry to attract victims from 2009 to 2021. Reports suggest that the brothers organized extravagant vacations for the victims, only to assault them during these trips.
Hyman noted that in sex trafficking cases, factors such as deception, drug use, and false pretenses play a crucial role in demonstrating force, fraud, or coercion. The prosecution must satisfy the burden of proof to substantiate the charges against the defendants.
According to the indictment, the Alexander brothers reportedly incapacitated women to facilitate sexual assaults during these encounters. Some assaults occurred soon after the suspects met the victims.
“Often, the Alexander brothers drugged their victims prior to the assaults, inhibiting their ability to resist or escape,” the indictment states.
The brothers operated the alleged trafficking scheme primarily from their bases in New York City and Miami, Florida, focusing on locations near their residences and business interests.
Prosecutors claim that following the assaults, the defendants sometimes offered victims material goods such as travel, concert tickets, and other luxurious incentives as a way to maintain control over them.
In federal court, prosecutors must demonstrate that force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion compelled the victim to engage in a sexual act. However, when a minor is involved, the need for this type of proof is altered. The prosecution must establish that the defendant knowingly recruited minors for commercial sex acts, regardless of the nature of force, fraud, or coercion.
Alon Alexander’s attorney, Howard Srebnick, referred to his client’s willingness to take a polygraph test, with the results reportedly supporting Alon’s claims of innocence. His attorney highlighted that Alon had been tested while incarcerated and that the polygraph examiner found no significant indicators of deception regarding allegations of drugging a woman.
In contrast, Tal Alexander’s attorney, Deanna Paul, has characterized the updated indictment as a reiteration of previously stated charges, insisting it does not alter their case or strategy. She maintains that the government has been attempting to stretch legal definitions to fit their narrative, suggesting that their conduct does not equate to federal sex trafficking.
The Alexander brothers currently remain detained at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center as they await trial. If convicted on the federal charges, they could face imprisonment ranging from 15 years to life.
The impending trial not only holds implications for the defendants but also raises broader questions about accountability in the real estate industry. As high-profile figures, the outcome could set a significant precedent for similar cases involving sexual misconduct and exploitation.
The Alexander brothers’ situation exemplifies how power dynamics can contribute to the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. The legal battle ahead will be closely watched, with its ramifications resonating far beyond the courtroom.
This case underscores the importance of systemic change in addressing sex trafficking. Advocates continue to stress the need for comprehensive laws and support systems to protect victims and deter potential offenders. As details of the case evolve, it remains crucial that justice is served for the individuals impacted by these allegations.