Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The City of Newark, led by its Democratic mayor, is under significant scrutiny after it filed a legal complaint against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. This complaint seeks to halt the reopening of Delaney Hall, a facility intended for processing undocumented immigrants for deportation. The administration argues that the process lacks adherence to essential building safety protocols.
Mayor Ras Baraka stated that the use of Delaney Hall for processing individuals in the country illegally violates both state and local legislation. As a result, the city initiated a lawsuit at the Essex County Superior Court near the close of March.
Baraka voiced his concerns, stating, “The City was informed that construction work is taking place in the building without required permits. The Department of Engineering imposed a stop work order to halt any and all construction on the site today. Two ICE officials and the GEO Group facility director on site were made aware of the violations.”
The mayor emphasized further violations, stating, “In addition, ICE has failed to apply for construction permits, continued certificates of occupancy, and requests to change the building’s use.” Notably, Delaney Hall is equipped with nearly 1,200 beds.
Baraka reiterated that the agreement between ICE and the GEO Group does not supersede local ordinances and procedures instituted by Newark and the State of New Jersey. “Without compliance with requirements, Delaney Hall cannot lawfully open. We will not tolerate federal attempts to ignore or evade our laws and statutes, which apply to everyone,” he asserted.
The GEO Group, which operates Delaney Hall, responded to these accusations, suggesting that the city’s actions represent a politically motivated effort that threatens both employment and community safety. A spokesperson for the GEO Group criticized local officials, stating, “The attempt by local and state officials to stop the opening of a lawful federal immigration processing center at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark is another unfortunate example of a politicized campaign… to interfere with the federal government’s efforts to arrest, detain, and deport dangerous criminal illegal aliens in accordance with established federal law.”
The spokesperson for GEO Group contended that the accusations against the facility are based on false claims. They indicated that Delaney Hall operated as a federal immigration processing center for six years during the Obama administration without significant opposition from local political figures.
Simultaneously, Newark’s Mayor Baraka has openly critiqued past ICE raids within the city. In January, a controversial operation resulted in the arrests of eight individuals. Baraka expressed his dissent regarding this operation, stating, “The problem with this is that none of these people were rapists, or murderers or criminals. The problem with it is that ICE went in there without a warrant.”
Baraka continued, highlighting the broader implications for Newark: “We don’t want an ICE detention in Newark. What we are concerned about is the erosion of the Constitution.” His remarks resonate amid ongoing tensions surrounding immigration policy in New Jersey.
State laws governing immigration have been contentious, leading to significant pushback from Republican lawmakers. There has been an ongoing trend where New Jersey state police have been directed not to comply with federal immigration requests. This directive has incited debate and controversy among officials.
Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli has commented on this climate, framing it as detrimental to community safety. He remarked, “The fact that my campaign received this email is evidence that brave and courageous law enforcement officers throughout New Jersey are angry about being handcuffed by liberal Democrat policies in Trenton, making our communities less safe.”
The ongoing legal battle regarding Delaney Hall illustrates a significant intersection of immigration policy and local governance. As the situation develops, the local community remains divided on the implications of reopening a federal facility designed for immigration processing. The argument extends beyond just legalities, reflecting deep-seated political and societal divides.
As Newark continues to navigate this tense situation, the balance between federal mandates and local governance will undoubtedly be scrutinized. Stakeholders on both sides of the aisle will be watching closely as legal proceedings unfold. The mayor’s stance emphasizes a commitment to local laws amidst pressures from federal authorities.
It remains to be seen how this conflict will shape the future landscape of immigration policy within New Jersey, a state that has repeatedly experienced significant shifts in its political climate regarding immigration issues.