Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The leadership at Politico has issued a strong rebuttal to what they describe as “misinformed” and “flat-out false” allegations surrounding subscription fees linked to federal agencies. In a joint communication to their audience, CEO Goli Sheikholeslami and Editor-in-Chief John Harris aim to clarify the misconception regarding the outlet’s financial model.
Amidst a wave of discussions on the social media platform X, Sheikholeslami and Harris took the opportunity to set the record straight. They affirm, “Politico is a privately owned company. We have never received any government funding – no subsidies, no grants, no handouts. Not one dime, ever, in 18 years. Millions worldwide access our journalism through Politico.com, Politico.EU, and various newsletters, supported entirely by advertising and sponsorships.” They clarified that the subscription service, Politico Pro, operates differently.
Politico Pro is a subscription-based service tailored for businesses, organizations, and some government entities. The executives defended the platform, stating, “Subscribers utilize this service to enhance their operational effectiveness. It assists them in tracking policy, legislation, and regulations in real-time through news, intelligence, and a suite of data products.” They elaborated that the focus of Politico Pro revolves around transparency and accountability, illuminating the workings of federal agencies and policymakers.
According to Sheikholeslami and Harris, the vast majority of Politico Pro’s subscribers hail from the private sector, with a remarkable 90% of them opting for subscription renewals. This statistic underscores the service’s relevance and demand in today’s complex regulatory environment.
Politico’s executives emphasized that when government agencies do subscribe to their service, they do so through standard public procurement processes—much like how other organizations acquire tools and services to improve operational efficiency. They noted, “This is not funding; it is a transaction. The government purchases a myriad of resources, including research, equipment, and software, which are essential for informed decision-making.” They rebuffed claims of financial dependence on government funds, emphasizing that their journalistic integrity remains unmarred by external financial influences.
The narrative surrounding Politico’s subscriptions intensified further when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt remarked that any government payments towards these subscriptions would be halted. Leavitt stated, “I can confirm that the more than $8 million taxpayer dollars that have been effectively subsidizing subscriptions to Politico will no longer be happening.” This statement has fueled ongoing discussions about government spending.
Amidst this debate, there was speculation about the origins of the reported $8 million in government spending. While some voices on social media suggested that all funds stemmed from USAID, it was revealed that merely $44,000 came from that agency. According to sources familiar with pricing, base subscriptions for Politico Pro typically range from $12,000 to $15,000 for three users.
It is crucial to note that government agency expenditures on Politico subscriptions occurred long before the Biden administration took office. Such spending has seen ongoing use across various governmental agencies as they navigate the complexities of legislative and regulatory frameworks.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, Politico’s leadership remains committed to ensuring transparency in its operations. They uphold their mission to deliver quality journalism that informs the public and policymakers alike. By clarifying their financial practices, Politico seeks to reinforce trust in their reporting and uphold their reputation as a critical source of political news.