Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Real Estate Mogul’s Alleged Attempts to Lure Employee Spark Lawsuit
A married CEO at a prominent real estate firm, valued at nearly $900 million, stands accused in a lawsuit of attempting to entice a female employee away from her husband. The allegations detail a series of supposed financial incentives aimed at her, raising serious questions about workplace ethics and personal conduct.
The lawsuit, initiated by Michael Steckling, claims that Tamir Poleg, the CEO of Real Brokerage, made repeated overtures to his subordinate, Paige Steckling, with substantial monetary offers. These enticements allegedly contributed directly to the unraveling of Michael and Paige Steckling’s marriage.
Sweeping Financial Offers Allegedly Made
The complaint outlines that beginning in January 2025, Poleg purportedly approached Paige, a mother of two, with proposals that included cash payments, real estate propositions, and luxury travel options. The lawsuit characterizes Poleg’s offer as an “indecent proposal,” indicative of a serious breach of professional boundaries.
According to the details, Poleg allegedly offered Paige Steckling over $500,000 in cash along with a home in Park City, Utah, which holds a market value ranging from $2 million to $3 million. It is suggested within the complaint that Poleg subsequently sent Paige instructions via email concerning access to $1.5 million, divided into two payments—$800,000 upfront and another $700,000 at a later date.
Stock Sales and Financial Support
The lawsuit reveals that Poleg sold more than $600,000 worth of Real Brokerage stock in early February 2025, purportedly to fund his proposed financial support to Paige. This action raises further questions about the motivations behind his offers.
Additionally, the filing alleges that Poleg arranged hotel accommodations in Miami for both himself and Paige in February 2025. Meetings occurred in various locations, including Las Vegas, Park City, and California, prior to his alleged financial overtures.
Marital Status Questions Emerge
Michael Steckling claims in the lawsuit that his marriage was stable before Poleg’s alleged propositions surfaced. He maintains that neither he nor Paige had previously discussed divorce. Court records indicate that Paige Steckling filed for divorce in February 2025, which aligns with the onset of these reported interactions with Poleg.
Real Brokerage Responds to Allegations
In response to the lawsuit, Real Brokerage has vehemently disputed the claims made against its CEO. Company representatives assert that Paige Steckling was never an employee and that Poleg never transferred any funds to her.
The firm also stated that Poleg had separated from his spouse before these events took place and suggested that his brief involvement with an independent contractor, who later filed for divorce, asserts no wrongdoing or interference on his part. They characterized the claims as baseless and filled with inaccuracies.
Allegations of Mischaracterization
Paige Steckling confirmed her divorce in a statement but contested the lawsuit’s portrayal of events. She noted, “My marriage ended for personal reasons, and the claims made in this lawsuit do not reflect the reality of those circumstances. I am confident the legal process will address any inaccuracies.”
Poleg acknowledged sending an email mentioned in the lawsuit but clarified that its content does not substantiate the claims being made. In his defense, he stated, “No offers, no romance, no interference,” insisting that any financial discussions were rooted in support requested by Paige, negating the idea of any wrongdoing.
A Legal Battle Over Alienation of Affection
Michael Steckling is pursuing legal action against Poleg for alienation of affection, seeking a minimum of $5 million in damages. This type of lawsuit is relatively rare but highlights the complex intersection of personal relationships and professional obligations.
Real Brokerage, the Utah-based company led by Poleg, boasts a valuation of approximately $886 million. As this case unfolds, it promises to draw significant attention, not only for its implications on workplace conduct but also for its potential ramifications on the reputations and futures of those involved.
What Comes Next?
The legal proceedings will continue as both sides prepare to present their cases. The outcome could have significant repercussions for all parties involved and may set a precedent in similar cases concerning workplace relationships and ethical boundaries.
This case serves as a critical reminder of the ethical considerations managers must navigate in professional environments, particularly when personal relationships might take a tumultuous turn. Stakeholders will be keenly observing how the situation develops, as the legal process progresses.
