Reassessing the Role of the U.S. Department of Education: Essential Functions That Must Endure

Reassessing the Role of the U.S. Department of Education: Essential Functions That Must Endure

For more than two centuries, the United States thrived without a federal Department of Education. Even now, many believe it is possible to navigate the educational landscape without such an agency. A closer examination shows that during the 45 years of its existence, meaningful progress among students has been limited. For instance, nine-year-olds today demonstrate reading skills similar to those recorded in 1979, the year the department was established.

Despite its intention to enhance academic achievement, having a cabinet-level agency dedicated to education has not necessarily led to smarter students or better schools. Furthermore, it has contributed to a troubling increase in education spending.

Consideration should be given to de-emphasizing the Department of Education, potentially reallocating its functions to other governmental entities. While congressional approval would be necessary for such a transition, it would not detrimentally impact current students or the nation’s educational future. This perspective comes from two former education secretaries, one serving under President Ronald Reagan and the other under President George H.W. Bush.

The Risk of Discarding Vital Educational Programs

Taking a step back from the department could lead to serious ramifications, particularly if essential programs currently managed by it are eliminated. It is crucial to retain certain key responsibilities of the Department of Education, even as we pursue reform. Among them are three fundamental roles that should not be abandoned, despite the necessary overhauls.

The Importance of National Assessments

The first critical function is