Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Rep. Lee Zeldin Announces Closure of Biden’s EPA Museum to Ensure Fiscal Responsibility
In a decisive move aimed at promoting transparency and fiscal responsibility, Rep. Lee Zeldin has disclosed plans to close the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) museum, a facility he cites as a symbol of wasteful spending. The museum, which cost $4 million to construct and more than $600,000 annually to operate, has drawn significant scrutiny as Zeldin identifies rampant misuse of taxpayer dollars under the Biden administration.
Significant Taxpayer Savings Through Museum Closure
Zeldin’s assertion highlights a staggering pattern of expenditures totaling over $22 billion that he argues could have been redirected towards enhancing public health and environmental quality. The recent closure of the EPA museum represents a specific instance of his broader effort to identify wasteful projects, as the facility saw less than 2,000 external visitors from May 2024 to February 2025, averaging less than five visitors a day.
In contrast, even the most under-visited Smithsonian facility typically attracts eight times that number each year. Zeldin emphasizes that the operational costs of this museum are unjustifiable, particularly given the small number of visitors.
Cost Breakdown Raises Eyebrows
The financial burden extended beyond the initial construction outlay. Zeldin points out that ongoing operational expenses covered a range of unnecessary services, including:
- Over $123,000 for cleaning and landscaping
- More than $207,000 allocated for security personnel
- $54,000 for maintenance of magnetometers and X-ray machines
- Over $54,000 on storage
- Nearly $40,000 for maintaining audiovisual equipment
This breakdown illustrates the alarming amount of taxpayer money spent on a facility that Zeldin characterizes as little more than a “one-room” exhibit tucked away within EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Shifting Focus From Partisan Politics to Core Mission
According to Zeldin, the museum exemplifies a troubling trend of redirecting resources away from the EPA’s foundational mission. He argues that funds spent on the museum could have been allocated to essential services such as:
- Replacing outdated lead pipes
- Cleaning up superfund sites on the National Priorities List
- Supporting state and local initiatives to enhance air quality
Instead, Zeldin claims that the Biden administration has prioritized initiatives that propagate partisan ideologies rather than making meaningful advancements in public health and environmental standards.
Biden’s EPA and the Museum’s Partisan Narrative
The museum’s historical narrative, curated under the current administration, has come under fire for its apparent partisan slant. Zeldin highlights a noticeable absence of recognition for achievements from earlier Republican administrations, especially from the Trump era, which he claims made significant strides in public health and environmental protection. This includes the reduction of pollutants and the introduction of historic policies, such as the first-ever comprehensive action plan addressing PFAS contamination.
For him, the omission of crucial accomplishments from the first Trump EPA reveals an ideological bias that undermines the agency’s credibility and the broader aim of providing unbiased environmental stewardship.
Reprioritizing Environmental Stewardship
Rather than supporting self-congratulatory displays, Zeldin argues that effective environmental stewardship should derive from practical and cost-effective initiatives that yield tangible improvements in community health and environmental standards. The museum’s closure exemplifies a renewed commitment under his leadership to ensure that taxpayer funds are strictly monitored and that every allocation serves the core mission of the EPA.
Commitment to Fiscal Responsibility
Zeldin’s announcement firmly establishes a commitment to reallocate resources towards initiatives that deliver real environmental improvements. He stresses the importance of justifying every dollar spent and ensuring that each program aligns with the agency’s primary objectives.
Through terminating costly and inefficient programs, Zeldin claims his office has already facilitated over $22 billion in savings for taxpayers. These funds could be better spent on initiatives that yield lasting benefits for neglected communities across the nation.
Forward-Looking Goals for Environmental Policy
The closure of the EPA museum marks just one change in a comprehensive strategy to prioritize the environment and public health over political agendas. Zeldin believes that eliminating wasteful spending will strengthen the government’s ability to address pressing environmental challenges.
He asserts that this is not a retreat from the commitment to environmental protection; rather, it represents a reorientation towards delivering impactful results while maintaining accountability for taxpayer dollars. The era of irresponsible spending for partisan purposes appears to be coming to an end.
Final Thoughts on the Future of EPA Operations
With the announcement of the museum’s closure, Zeldin has demonstrated a clear vision for the future of the EPA. He emphasizes the need for all initiatives to contribute to the mission of delivering clean air, land, and water to all Americans. Under his leadership, he asserts that the EPA will once again prioritize its fundamental role in protecting the environment and public health over serving any ideological narrative.
The American people deserve transparency and accountability in how their tax dollars are spent. Zeldin’s commitment sets the stage for a new, responsible era of environmental governance.
