Restoring Anno Domini: A Call to Action for Historical Integrity

In recent years, the term Common Era (CE) has gradually supplanted the traditional Anno Domini (AD) in various historical texts. While this change might seem minor at first, it represents a significant shift in our cultural and historical representation.

The movement to replace AD with CE reflects broader ideological trends in academia that often dismiss historical significance tied to Christianity. This article explores the implications of this shift and argues for the restoration of Anno Domini in our historical works, particularly under a potential Trump administration.

The Importance of Anno Domini

Anno Domini serves not only as a chronological label but also as a narrative explanation. By denoting the current year as 2025, we are essentially reminded that this date is rooted in the life of Jesus Christ who lived over two millennia ago. This connection is crucial for understanding our chronological system and maintaining continuity with our historical narrative.

Across more than a millennium, AD has served as a linguistic bridge, connecting our current understanding with texts that have historically begun with the phrase, ‘In the year of our Lord.’ From religious manuscripts to classic historical works, the use of AD showcases a continuity of faith and scholarship.

Progressive Historians and the Shift to Common Era

Many progressive historians advocate for the use of Common Era, claiming it offers a secular alternative that separates religious beliefs from historical scholarship. This argument, however, lacks substantial evidence and oversimplifies a complex issue.

A closer examination reveals that the months of the year are named after Roman deities without raising any significant outcry from those who favor CE. For instance, March derives its name from Mars, the Roman god of war, yet this pagan origin does not threaten modern sensibilities. The selective outrage surrounding the use of AD indicates a deeper ideological battle rather than a genuine concern for neutrality.

The Ideological Underpinnings of Historical Narratives

Leftist scholars often argue that the usage of AD imposes Christian values upon non-Christians, thus advocating for a more neutral terminology. However, this perspective overlooks the historical context in which Christianity played a pivotal role in shaping Western civilization.

Christianity is not merely an aspect of Western history; it fundamentally defines it. Efforts to diminish its significance through the adoption of terms like CE may, in fact, attempt to rewrite history rather than accurately represent it. Such a narrative shift risks erasing important cultural milestones and contributions rooted in Christian tradition.

The Path Forward: Presidential Action

To counter this trend, a decisive action by President Trump could significantly alter the trajectory of historical representation in the United States. An executive order mandating the use of Anno Domini in all federal documents could restore a crucial aspect of our historical identity.

Implementing such a change is straightforward. By requiring federal publications and federally funded documents to adopt AD, Trump could initiate a much-needed reconciliation with our history. Given the significant federal investment in university publications and historical texts, this alteration could quickly gain traction.

Challenges and Critiques

While this proposal may invite fierce criticism, including accusations of censorship and undermining academic freedom, it is essential to recognize the impact of taxpayer funding on educational institutions. Many Americans, irrespective of their religious convictions, might be unwilling to support a narrative that marginalizes Christianity in favor of a politically correct agenda.

The erasure of Anno Domini serves as a warning sign — a canary in the coal mine that indicates deeper societal issues at play. It is often the subtler changes within our language and culture that lay the groundwork for more significant transformations. Recognizing these shifts is crucial for safeguarding our historical integrity.

A Cultural Reawakening

As discussions regarding cultural identity and historical representation continue, the restoration of Anno Domini is both timely and necessary. The ongoing battle over language reflects broader ideological tensions and spans beyond mere nomenclature.

For many, the use of Anno Domini is more than a reference point; it symbolizes a connection to a shared past and a collective cultural identity. Reinstating AD could revitalize crucial dialogues about our history and honor the influence of Christianity on Western civilization.

In conclusion, taking steps to revive Anno Domini in historical discourse is vital not only for preserving our past but also for shaping a more coherent narrative for our future. By advocating for this change, we not only reaffirm our connection to history but also challenge the prevailing trend of cultural erasure that threatens to redefine our shared identity.