Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A city councilmember in San Diego, California, has faced significant backlash online after posting a controversial image of ICE agents on Instagram. The photo, which features the word “Terrorists” emblazoned in red over the agents, sparked intense discussions about immigration enforcement and public safety.
Sean Elo-Rivera, who represents the 9th City Council District, shared the image along with the Rage Against The Machine song “Bulls On Parade” as a backdrop. In the photo, immigration enforcement officers are shown in a parking lot, wearing tactical gear and armed.
Elo-Rivera expressed his feelings about the image, stating, “Look at this photo. This isn’t a war zone—it’s a neighborhood in our city.” He accused ICE agents of targeting vulnerable community members, such as parents dropping off their children at school and individuals attending courthouse proceedings. He argued that these actions do not reflect safety but rather equate to state-sponsored terrorism.
In his post, he urged his followers to consider the implications of these actions, declaring, “Anyone who cares about freedom—and true safety—should be fighting back.” This declaration has resonated with some in San Diego, aligning with ongoing protests against aggressive immigration policies.
Before his Friday night post, Elo-Rivera used Instagram stories to voice concerns over ICE’s tactics in his district. He lamented, “They have targeted parents outside schools in my district. They have targeted people following the law in courthouses. Tonight, they went after hardworking individuals in South Park. Tomorrow, it could be anyone in any neighborhood in San Diego. We must not look away and demand an end to these practices.”
In a series of pointed remarks, he labeled ICE agents as “jackbooted thugs,” “cowards,” and “criminals.” He emphasized his view that the actions taken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement represent a form of state-sponsored terrorism.
Following the public outcry on social media, LA-based Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin highlighted Elo-Rivera’s posts, amplifying the controversy that ensued. The councilmember responded to this attention, reaffirming his stance on the language he used. He tweeted, “A Fox News correspondent highlighted my choice of words… I meant what I said.”
In another attempt to contextualize his words, Elo-Rivera shared information from Cornell Law School’s website regarding the definition of terrorism. He noted that the definition lacks a universal explanation and provided a list of common elements that characterize it, adding fuel to the ongoing debate around the terminology used in relation to ICE.
Prominent figures have also joined in the discussion. Stephen Miller, a senior advisor to the White House, took to social media, criticizing Elo-Rivera’s comments. He asserted, “We are living in the age of leftwing domestic terrorism. They are openly encouraging violence against law enforcement to aid and abet the invasion of America.”
Elo-Rivera responded fiercely to Miller’s criticism, calling him “one of the most dishonest and worst people in America” and stating that knowing Miller disapproves of his views only strengthens his resolve.
These heated exchanges surfaced just hours after Patricia Hyde, the head of ICE Boston, indicated that sanctuary jurisdictions are increasingly hostile toward ICE officers. She noted incidents where activists attempted to free detainees and obstruct law enforcement operations. Hyde expressed concern over these trends, saying, “The lack of cooperation is getting worse and worse, putting law enforcement lives in danger.”
Despite numerous requests for comment, responses were not immediately provided by Cornell University, Cornell Law School, ICE, or San Diego City Council President Joe LaCava.
In the larger context of immigration in America, Elo-Rivera’s remarks highlight an intensely polarized debate. Supporters of stricter immigration enforcement argue that agencies like ICE play a crucial role in national security, while opponents label these tactics as inhumane and aggressive.
In addition to Elo-Rivera’s fervent stance against ICE, many community members have echoed similar sentiments, advocating for a shift in how immigration laws are enforced and urging local leaders to support more humane policies.
As the conversation evolves, San Diego finds itself at the intersection of local governance and national immigration discourse. The community is split, with some supporting Elo-Rivera’s controversial remarks while others regard them as incendiary and unrepresentative of the broader population.
While Elo-Rivera continues to advocate for his views, the reactions to his statements reflect deep-seated divisions over immigration policy in the United States. As this matter unfolds, it will be essential to monitor both community sentiments and official responses to ensure that public discourse remains respectful and focused on effective solutions.
This ongoing dialogue illustrates not just local concerns but the larger implications of federal immigration policies as they affect communities across the nation.
