Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Sanctuary city leaders in upstate New York expressed strong disapproval during a press conference held on Wednesday, criticizing their own police department for assisting federal authorities in detaining individuals. The incident unfolded when police from the Rochester Police Department responded to a call from Border Patrol and Homeland Security Investigations regarding a van suspected of carrying multiple occupants.
On Monday, officers from the Rochester Police Department were dispatched to the scene based on an emergency request from federal agents. Once there, the RPD officers ordered the occupants out of the vehicle and assisted in handcuffing them. This action has sparked significant controversy.
Democratic Rochester Mayor Malik Evans strongly criticized the police officers’ actions, labeling their conduct as contradictory to the city’s sanctuary resolution and specific police general orders. These regulations clearly prohibit local law enforcement from enforcing immigration laws.
During the press briefing, Evans emphasized, “The actions of the officers on the scene represent a violation of our policy. Specifically, city police officers are explicitly instructed not to engage or assist in federal immigration activities.”
Footage from the scene appears to show several unmarked Border Patrol and HSI vehicles surrounding a work van that contained ladders on its roof. The arrival of RPD officers is evident, with two stepping out of their vehicle when federal agents detained the driver.
According to local news reports, Rochester police officers handcuffed additional individuals removed from the van. The specifics regarding the number of detentions and the reasons behind them remain unclear, given the incident’s location approximately 90 miles east of Niagara Falls and the U.S.-Canada border.
Footage captured by bystanders shows a woman engaging in a heated exchange with two HSI agents, as she insisted on speaking with her husband, insisting, “They’re not illegal.” This moment reflects the broader community tensions surrounding immigration enforcement in sanctuary cities.
In light of the incident, Evans instructed Police Chief David Smith to reinforce the city’s directives with all members of the Rochester Police Department. Chief Smith joined Evans in his criticism, stating concern regarding the officers’ urgency during the call for assistance.
He remarked, “Upon reviewing video footage, it is disconcerting to witness a noticeable lack of urgency displayed by multiple Border Patrol agents present at the scene.”
In a debriefing issued by Smith to the officers involved, he outlined strict guidelines for future conduct during similar situations. Smith advised, “If an event like this arises again, we will not remove individuals from vehicles, handcuff subjects, conduct pat frisks, or detain them in any capacity. This is non-negotiable.”
The Rochester Police Locust Club, which represents officers, defended the actions of the responding officers, characterizing the mayor’s remarks as a significant overreaction to what was, in their view, a routine emergency response. In a public statement, the union argued that when officers arrived, the subjects were non-cooperative, and local police had not initiated the stop, nor had they inquired about immigration statuses.
The union further stated, “Under circumstances where another law enforcement agency indicates it has a critical situation ongoing in the City of Rochester, our officers responded with lights and sirens, expecting to assist their colleagues in distress when they arrived at the scene.” They concluded that officers acted appropriately by responding to a request for help.
This incident raises important questions about the role of local police in immigration matters and the challenges faced by sanctuary cities. Many community members express concerns over cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, and how this impacts the broader immigrant community.
The episode reflects ongoing tensions between city policy and federal immigration enforcement practices, leading to heightened scrutiny of police responses in sanctuary jurisdictions. As officials navigate these complex issues, the debate surrounding immigration enforcement and local compliance will likely continue to intensify.
As such, it is crucial for citizens to stay informed about local policies, understand their rights in interactions with law enforcement, and engage in discussions regarding best practices for upholding community values while ensuring public safety. The challenge remains finding a balance between maintaining law and order and honoring local sentiments toward immigrant populations.