Scott Peterson Seeks Overturn of Murder Conviction with New Evidence Claims

Attorneys representing Scott Peterson have officially filed a petition asking for his murder conviction to be overturned. They argue that this petition includes substantial new evidence which supports the claim that Peterson, now 52 years old, did not commit the murders of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner, back in 2002.

The Los Angeles Innocence Project, which has recently taken on Peterson’s case, submitted a writ of habeas corpus on Monday. In a press release, the organization stated that this important legal filing contains what they believe to be significant new evidence. Peterson’s legal team contends that his rights to due process and a fair trial were violated during his original trial in 2004. They assert that these factors merit the reversal of his conviction.

According to the legal documents filed this week, the petition asserts, “This Writ of Habeas Corpus presents new evidence that was not available at the time of trial, supports Petitioner’s claim of innocence, and shows he was wrongfully convicted.” It further emphasizes that the new evidence undermines the prosecution’s entire circumstantial case against Peterson. Significantly, it alleges that jurors were misled by false and misleading scientific information.

Peterson’s attorneys contend that the prosecution’s case relied solely on circumstantial evidence, stating, “No direct, physical or forensic evidence was uncovered to substantiate any part of the prosecution’s narrative or implicate Peterson in the alleged crimes.” This strong assertion draws attention to flaws in the judicial process surrounding Peterson’s trial.

Details of the Original Case

In 2004, a jury found Peterson guilty of murdering his wife Laci and of second-degree murder for the death of their unborn son, Conner. Laci Peterson was last seen on Christmas Eve in 2002, at their home in Modesto, California. Several months later, in April 2003, a passerby discovered Conner’s decomposed body in the waters of the San Francisco Bay.

Peterson’s legal team argued in their recent petition that jurors were not presented with crucial evidence that could have significantly influenced the outcome of the trial. They have accused the prosecution of potentially destroying key evidence that might have favored the defense.

New Evidence and Its Implications

The petition asserts that, “Every aspect of the prosecution’s theory regarding the circumstances under which the crimes occurred has now been proven to be false.” The new evidence referenced in this amended petition allegedly demonstrates that the prosecution’s case was fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, it argues that while individual errors may not warrant relief on their own, a combination of constitutional or statutory violations can sufficiently undermine confidence in a conviction.

Peterson’s legal representatives claim that this is exactly the situation in this case. They highlight that the entirety of the new evidence presented here is more than enough to establish a prima facie case for Peterson’s innocence, thereby justifying a reassessment of his conviction.

Support from the Innocence Project

The Los Angeles Innocence Project officially became involved in Peterson’s case earlier this year. This organization is dedicated to assisting individuals it believes to have been wrongfully convicted, and they have committed their resources to meticulously reviewing the details surrounding Peterson’s case.

Additionally, the significance of the renewed attention on Peterson’s case cannot be understated. His family and supporters recently expressed feelings of renewed hope, which coincided with his recent transfer to a different prison facility.

Public and Media Reaction