Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Senator Kaine Critiques Founding Principles During Senate Hearing
A Senate Democrat expressed deep concern during a recent Senate hearing where Donald Trump’s nominees were discussed. Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, scrutinized remarks made by recent appointee Riley Barnes, who is slated to become the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights, and labor.
During the Senate Foreign Relations hearing on Wednesday, Barnes referenced Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s assertion regarding the core principles of the United States. He remarked, ‘We are a nation founded on a powerful principle, and that powerful principle is that all men are created equal, because our rights come from God our Creator — not from our laws, not from our governments.’
Understanding the Foundations of Rights
Barnes emphasized that the United States is committed to safeguarding this principle. He stated, ‘We are a nation of individuals, each made in the image of God and possessing an inherent dignity. This is a truth that our founders understood as essential to American self-government.’
However, Senator Kaine opposed Barnes’ definition of rights. He articulated that the implication that rights originate from a divine source rather than legal frameworks or governmental structures is deeply troubling.
Kaine, a practicing Catholic, said, ‘The notion that rights don’t come from laws and don’t come from the government, but come from the Creator, that’s what the Iranian government believes.’ He drew parallels between this statement and the theological basis for governance in Iran, noting that it is a theocratic regime grounded in Shia law, which discriminates against Sunnis, Bahá’ís, Jews, Christians, and various other religious minorities.
Exploring the Definition of Natural Rights
Senator Kaine continued, stating, ‘They do it because they believe they understand what natural rights are from their Creator. Hence, the claim that our rights do not come from our laws or our governments is extremely troubling.’
While Senator Kaine affirmed his belief in natural rights, he acknowledged that differing perspectives on these rights could lead to considerable debate among committee members with his varied views and religious backgrounds.
The Legal Framework of American Rights
The Constitution does not specifically mention God or a Creator, while the Declaration of Independence firmly asserts this idea. The document famously states, ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’
The Backlash Against Kaine’s Remarks
Kaine’s views garnered sharp criticism from Bishop Robert Barron of Minnesota, who responded on social media. Barron accused the senator of denying the fundamental belief that rights derive from God rather than governmental authority.
‘If the government creates our rights, it can take them away,’ Barron stated. He expressed concern that if rights depend on government, that could lead to significant changes at the whims of those in power.
Reflecting on the implications of Kaine’s remarks, Barron added, ‘It just strikes me as extraordinary that a major American politician wouldn’t understand this really elemental part of our system. God help us, I mean that literally, God help us if we say our rights are coming to us from the government; that gives the government, indeed, Godlike power.’
Seeking Clarity on Foundational Beliefs
While debates about the source of rights are not new, this particular exchange highlights the ongoing discourse regarding the intersection of faith, politics, and legal principles in America. The discussion has implications for how laws are interpreted and applied in a nation with diverse beliefs and traditions.
Senator Kaine’s office did not respond immediately to inquiries regarding his statement and its criticism, leaving many to ponder the broader questions that lie at the heart of this debate.
As the nation navigates issues of democracy and governance, the contrasting views on the origins of rights could play a pivotal role in shaping future policies. Advocates for both perspectives must articulate their positions clearly to foster constructive dialogues in an increasingly polarized environment.
