Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
EXCLUSIVE REPORT: Senator Mike Rounds, a Republican from South Dakota, has confirmed that he is actively discussing plans with President Trump’s administration to propose legislation aimed at the dissolution of the Department of Education. This undertaking aligns with Trump’s recent executive order, which sets the stage for significant changes in federal education policy.
In the lead-up to Trump’s controversial executive order to eliminate the Education Department, Rounds has engaged in prolonged discussions with Trump’s inner circle. His office revealed to Fox News Digital that these talks center around reviving Rounds’ previously introduced proposal, which seeks to dismantle the federal education agency.
With the official signing of the executive order, Rounds now plans to resubmit his bill. He asserts, “The federal bureaucracy of Education has never educated a single student. It’s time to shut it down. Today’s news is a step in the right direction. Congress should follow the executive branch’s lead and act accordingly.”
Rounds emphasizes the importance of returning educational authority to states and local school districts. He expresses his intention to preserve essential programs, including special education and Title I funding. Furthermore, Rounds indicates ongoing discussions about this legislative initiative with Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos. He expresses optimism regarding the potential passage of the bill.
Previously, Rounds introduced the “Returning Education to Our States Act” during the last congressional session. However, the bill failed to gain traction in a Democrat-controlled Congress. His current proposal aims not only to abolish the Department of Education but also to redistribute its monitoring duties and educational responsibilities to various other federal departments.
On the 2024 campaign trail, Trump proclaimed his intent to eliminate the Department of Education in Washington, D.C., asserting, “One thing I’ll be doing very early in the administration is closing up the Department of Education and sending all education and education work it needs back to the states.” This promise reflects a long-standing goal of the Trump administration.
As part of Trump’s strategy, he has made it clear that critical components of federal education funding, such as Pell Grants and resources for children with disabilities, will remain unaffected. At the signing of the executive order, Trump stated, “The department’s useful functions will be preserved, fully preserved. They’re going to be preserved in full and redistributed to various other agencies and departments that will take very good care of them.”
This sweeping proposal has elicited mixed reactions from lawmakers and advocacy groups across the political spectrum. Critics argue that dismantling the Education Department could threaten vital funding and oversight for schools, while supporters claim it would return control to more localized authorities.
Round’s plan to spearhead this legislation could shift the landscape of federal education policy significantly. Observers note how this move may set a precedent for further reductions in the size and scope of federal government agencies.
Should the Rounds-Trump initiative succeed, it may alter how public education is managed and funded at every level. Many are closely watching the developments as the implications could be profound, potentially reshaping the educational framework for millions of students across the nation.
In the coming weeks, Rounds plans to gather support among fellow lawmakers. He will likely emphasize the need for states to take a more active role in education. The senator will focus on legislative pathways to ensure that the proposed changes can be effectively implemented.
As discussions around this proposal continue, it remains essential for stakeholders to voice their opinions. Educators, parents, and students will need to engage in dialogue about these potential changes. The outcomes of this legislative push may have far-reaching consequences for the future of education in the U.S.
As the country navigates these challenging times, education policy is at a critical junction. The Rounds-Trump collaboration illustrates how current political dynamics can influence educational governance. With the possibility of significant shifts in federal education policies on the horizon, both proponents and opponents of such changes must prepare for an intense legislative battle ahead.