Soros-Backed Indivisible Group Targets Key House Race with Progressive Candidate

Soros-Backed Indivisible Group Targets Key House Race with Progressive Candidate

The progressive organization Indivisible, known for its role in various Tesla protests and other far-left initiatives, has now set its sights on influencing a crucial congressional swing district. Their aim is to bolster opposition to President Donald Trump within Congress.

As primary contests ramp up for the 2026 Midterm elections, Indivisible seems focused on taking down Republican Representative Mike Lawler, who serves New York’s 17th Congressional District. The group’s chosen candidate is Beth Davidson, a progressive Democrat and Rockland County legislator with strong ties to Indivisible.

Davidson’s Involvement with Indivisible

Davidson’s social media activity reflects her close association with Indivisible. She has shared multiple posts promoting the organization, including her attendance at an event in Rockland, New York. Additionally, she appeared in a promotional video for Indivisible Northern Westchester.

Local chapters of Indivisible have actively participated in recent electoral activities, organizing protests at Lawler’s town hall meetings in April and May.

Protests and Anti-Lawler Sentiment

Reports indicate that local Indivisible leaders planned a significant anti-Lawler protest, demonstrating their intent to challenge the Republican’s presence. Video footage from an organizing meeting showcased committee leader Pascale Jean-Gilles expressing the need to attract a substantial crowd for maximum visibility.

Jean-Gilles stated, “We’re trying to fill the entire street, so everyone coming into the rally will see people there and recognize it’s not going to be all, like, sunshine and daisies.” Davidson also predicted that over a thousand protesters would join the action, urging her followers to show their strength against Lawler.

Davidson’s Advocacy Against Lawler

In a notable display of solidarity, Davidson proudly announced her participation in protests, declaring on social media that she stood with more than a thousand people advocating for their rights. She asserted, “Mike Lawler may be silent on the daily assaults on healthcare, education, social security, and national security, but We the People are NOT!” This mounting pressure signifies a greater push against Lawler’s congressional tenure.

Furthermore, Davidson publicly congratulated Indivisible Rockland on organizing a packed event, reiterating claims that Lawler is avoiding engagement with his constituents.

Financial Connections and Allegations

Compounding the campaign dynamics, records show that Bill Batson, a committee member of Indivisible Rockland, made a financial contribution to Davidson’s campaign. In light of these connections, a spokesperson from the National Republican Congressional Committee raised concerns, accusing Indivisible of infiltrating congressional races to undermine Trump’s agenda.

Maureen O’Toole stated, “Indivisible has a new plan: stop shouting outside congressional offices and start infiltrating them. Their first attempt? NY-17, where they’re backing far-left extremist Beth Davidson to carry out their agenda.” Such remarks underscore the heightened scrutiny surrounding the progressive group’s strategies.

Indivisible’s Origins and Funding

Formed in response to Trump’s election in 2016, Indivisible identifies as a grassroots movement aimed at resisting his administration’s policies. According to its official website, Indivisible combines the efforts of thousands of group leaders and over a million members who seek to elect progressive representatives and advocate for comprehensive policy reform.

Moreover, Indivisible has received significant financial support, reportedly over $7 million from the George Soros network since 2017. The group has been involved in protests against various issues, including calls to abolish ICE and defund the police.

Strategies and Tactics in Protests

Earlier this year, Indivisible released a toolkit aimed at assisting activists in organizing protests at town halls and lawmakers’ district offices. This included guidance for planning demonstrations targeting Tesla dealerships in response to Elon Musk’s policies during his tenure as head of the Department of Government Efficiency.

While many protests outside Tesla facilities remained nonviolent, others escalated to violent confrontations, with the Department of Justice describing some actions as domestic terrorism, including instances of arson.

Political Repercussions of Association

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a representative for Lawler’s campaign criticized Davidson’s affiliation with Indivisible, labeling it disgraceful. The spokesperson referenced the group’s past rallies, which allegedly featured Nazi imagery and anti-Semitic tropes. They called for Davidson to outright denounce Indivisible, emphasizing that such rhetoric poses threats to civic stability.

In response, Davidson condemned offensive imagery encountered at one of the rallies in a social media post, insisting that she remains an ardent advocate against anti-Semitism.

The Race Heats Up in New York’s 17th District

The upcoming race in New York’s 17th District has garnered significant attention as it is viewed as one of the most competitive contests in the country. With Republicans striving to maintain their slim majority in Congress, the stakes are high in this pivotal election.

The Cook Political Report currently labels the race as Lean Republican, reflecting its precarious nature. As Davidson and other Democrats prepare for the primary, the spotlight on this district is likely to intensify.

Looking Ahead: A Transformative Election Cycle

The involvement of Indivisible in this house race marks a significant point in the electoral landscape. With a focus on progressive values and activism, the candidate’s campaign has unleashed a wave of political engagement within the community. As the elections approach, the battle lines appear drawn, and voters in New York’s 17th Congressional District will play a crucial role in determining the future composition of Congress.