Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Stephanie Turner, a women’s fencer, has emerged as a notable figure in the ongoing debate surrounding transgender inclusion in sports. Her recent actions, which include kneeling to protest a transgender opponent, have ignited widespread discussions on women’s rights in athletics.
A viral video of Turner kneeling during her match has captured the attention of activists and sparked conversation about the role of transgender athletes in women’s sports, particularly in fencing.
“It will probably, at least for the moment, destroy my life,” Turner expressed in a candid interview. “It’s very hard for me to do this.” Her statement highlights the personal and professional stakes she believes she faces in this heated debate.
Turner’s stance is rooted in her conviction against competing against biological males. She elaborated on her perspective, stating, “This is a serious issue that is happening within all sports, and it needs to be addressed. There is a difference between men and women. It is a civil rights movement for women and girls, and I prioritize the safety and rights of women and girls over trans-identified males.”
What makes Turner’s position more surprising is her political transformation. The longtime registered Democrat describes her shift to a “new Republican conservative” due to concerns over transgender athletes in women’s sports. She believes that a minority group is pushing a liberal agenda that puts the broader community of female athletes at risk.
Turner’s journey began in Washington D.C., where she was raised. Currently residing in Montgomery County, Maryland, she has built close friendships through her involvement in the fencing community. Among her friends are several individuals from the LGBT community, which complicates her position further.
“They did not know I had this opinion about transgender women in women’s sports,” she revealed. “I love them on a personal level, and I don’t want them to think I somehow hate them. I worry about losing those friendships.”
Despite her affection for her friends, Turner feels that open dialogue on the subject has become almost impossible. “They lie and say that estrogen can make a man a woman also to the point where you cannot tell the difference, and it just becomes an insane argument,” she reflected.
Turner began her fencing career at the age of 19, joining the club at the University of Maryland. Over the last 12 years, she has become deeply invested in the sport, with numerous competitions under her belt. Turner boasts an impressive record, including 21 podium finishes and a gold medal at a recent event.
Her success reflects a commitment to the sport that involves significant time and financial resources, including for travel, equipment, and competition fees.
Turner’s awareness of USA Fencing’s official gender eligibility policy intensified her concerns. The policy permits transgender athletes to compete in women’s categories after a year of testosterone suppression treatment, requiring proof of hormone therapy.
In November 2022, USA Fencing revealed an initiative aimed at promoting inclusive practices, preferring tournament-hosting states that uphold LGBTQ-friendly laws. These policies have further compounded the issues surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports.
Turner explained, “In fencing, personally, I see it quite often. I have witnessed transgender fencers in women’s tournaments and girls tournaments in different age categories, specifically Y-14, the youngest age group.”
Her experiences with transgender opponents have been complex. In 2013, she chose not to participate in an event after discovering that a trans athlete, previously known as a biological male, would be competing. “I never registered because I knew that he was going to be in there,” she said, showing her discontent with the changes in the landscape of competitive fencing.
The events leading to Turner’s protest took a dramatic turn when she found out that she would face a transgender opponent, Redmond Sullivan, during a Division I-A event at her alma mater. Knowing the implications of the match weighed heavy on her mind, she contemplated her approach.
“I had thought about not registering for events with transgender individuals, but that might not work going forward. So I decided to let it unfold and kneel if I had to, trusting that it was God’s will,” Turner explained.
Her protest culminated just moments before her match when she asked a close friend to film the kneel. This pivotal moment garnered attention from across the fencing world and resulted in her disqualification from the event.
Turner was escorted out swiftly, leaving little time for her to communicate with teammates or coaches. She had not sought this role but felt compelled to take a stand. “I was hoping someone else would come forward or the board of directors would have a change of heart,” she admitted.
Turner’s actions have placed her at the forefront of a larger culture war regarding transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports. She has been featured in interviews and media pieces, and her story caught the attention of sports advocacy groups.
As she navigates the ramifications of her actions, Turner remains clear about her mission. “It’s a litmus test for common sense in whether a politician is able to lie to your face to abide by common culture. Something needs to be done.”
In response to Turner’s disqualification and the incident, USA Fencing issued a statement explaining that their policies aim to create inclusive environments in the sport. They emphasized the necessity of respectful dialogue amidst differing viewpoints.
While USA Fencing insists that Turner was disqualified for refusing to compete rather than her protests, the broader implications of her actions continue to resonate, prompting further discussions about the balance between inclusion and fairness in women’s sports.
Turner’s journey has opened a dialogue that reaches beyond fencing to encapsulate the evolving conversation about gender identity and rights in athletics. Her story symbolizes the tensions that exist within these discussions, which are likely to continue shaping the future of sports.
As activists and organizations navigate this contentious issue, Turner’s defiance offers a compelling case study on the intersection of sports, politics, and personal belief systems.