Texas Lawmaker Introduces Bill Aimed at Eliminating Non-Human Behavior in Schools

Texas Lawmaker Introduces Bill Aimed at Eliminating Non-Human Behavior in Schools

A Texas lawmaker has taken a significant step by proposing legislation to prohibit what he describes as ‘non-human behavior’ in public schools. This bill specifically targets behaviors typically associated with furries, such as barking and meowing.

The proposed legislation, known as the Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education Act, or FURRIES Act, was introduced last week in the state’s House by Republican Representative Stan Gerdes.

In a post on social media platform X, Gerdes stated, ‘No distractions. No theatrics. Just education. Texas schools are for educating kids, not indulging in radical trends. Let’s keep the focus where it belongs—on preparing students for success in life.’

Details of the FURRIES Act

The FURRIES Act seeks to uphold a traditional educational environment by banning various animal-like behaviors. Students would be unable to engage in actions such as using litter boxes, licking themselves, or making sounds like barking, meowing, or hissing.

Furthermore, the legislation includes provisions that would prevent students from wearing accessories not designed for human use. This includes items such as animal ears, tails, collars, and leashes. However, the bill clarifies that natural human hair and wigs are exempt from this prohibition.

Enforcement and Potential Consequences

This legislation mandates that students present themselves as human beings within the school environment. Additionally, students would not be allowed to form groups or clubs that center around non-human behavior or advocate for its acceptance in society.

Exceptions to the restrictions do exist. For example, students may dress in costume for Halloween or other school events that celebrate human history. These events would be capped at five days per school year. Theater performances and dressing as school mascots are also permitted.

The bill outlines strict disciplinary measures for non-compliance. Students who violate these guidelines could face removal from class, suspension, or even expulsion. Moreover, there is a provision for transferring violators to alternative education programs designed for juveniles.

Implications for School Districts and Educators

Teachers will have a vital role in enforcing the measures put forth by the FURRIES Act. They would be required to report any infractions to the Texas attorney general. School districts that fail to uphold these regulations could incur fines beginning at $10,000 for an initial offense, escalating to $25,000 for subsequent violations.

This bill has received significant backing from prominent political figures in Texas, including Governor Greg Abbott and House Speaker Dustin Burrows, both of whom are members of the Republican Party.

Support from State Officials

Governor Abbott emphasized the primary purpose of public schooling during a recent gathering in Austin. He asserted, ‘If you have a child in a public school, you have one expectation: your children’s going to be learning the fundamentals of education—reading, writing, math, and science.’ Abbott mentioned the furry issue as a reason for advocating private school choice vouchers.

‘If they’re being distracted by furries, those parents have a right to move their child to a school of their choice,’ he added.

A Call for Common Sense Legislation

Representative Gerdes characterized his bill as a measure of common sense, expressing gratitude to Abbott and Burrows for their support. ‘I’m grateful that our leadership is taking this issue seriously and ensuring that Texas schools remain places of learning, not roleplaying,’ he stated on X.

Gerdes firmly believes that the FURRIES Act would foster an environment conducive to education. He concluded, ‘This is common sense. Let’s get it passed.’

While the bill’s proposal has stirred debate, its intention remains focused on maintaining educational integrity. As discussions continue, the bill is likely to face scrutiny and varying opinions on its implications for student expression and behavior in Texas schools.