Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

After nearly two decades of navigating airport security barefoot, American travelers can finally keep their shoes on. The Department of Homeland Security has recently ended one of the most prominent post-9/11 security measures. This rule originated from a failed terrorist attack in 2001 when British national Richard Reid attempted to ignite explosives concealed in his sneakers during a flight.
Despite the foiled attack, Reid’s actions initiated a new era of airport screening, which led millions of passengers to remove their shoes at security checkpoints—until now.
The history of this policy dates back to December 22, 2001, when Reid boarded American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami. He hid plastic explosives and a makeshift detonator in his black high-top sneakers. Reid attempted to light a fuse mid-flight but was quickly subdued by alert passengers and flight crew.
This incident revealed a significant weakness in aviation security systems, particularly in detecting non-metallic threats like PETN, the explosive used by Reid.
Jeff Price, an aviation security expert and professor at Metropolitan State University of Denver, emphasized that security technology at the time was not equipped to recognize the types of explosives Reid utilized. Price remarked that it wasn’t until 2006, five years after the incident, that the shoe removal policy was formally instituted.
Following 9/11 and Reid’s attempted bombing, airport security procedures underwent rapid changes. Unfortunately, the accompanying technology lagged behind the emerging threats. Early metal detectors struggled to identify objects near the floor level and were incapable of detecting explosives.
Shoe removal became a workaround for the limitations of detection technologies. Price explained that the mindset was clear: if the machinery couldn’t see it, the solution was to have travelers remove their shoes. This policy remained in place for years, despite significant advancements in security technology.
According to Price, the shift began with the widespread adoption of millimeter wave imaging scanners. These sophisticated machines can detect not only metal but also ceramics, plastics, liquids, and explosives. They scan everything from head to toe, providing a more thorough security assessment.
Price highlighted the effectiveness of millimeter wave technology, stating that it has been gradually replacing traditional metal detectors since the late 2000s. As of now, hundreds of these advanced machines have been deployed across airports, making travel significantly safer and more efficient.
The recent policy reversal may bring long-awaited relief to millions of passengers accustomed to juggling shoes, bins, and boarding passes during security checks. Price believes this change will likely reduce wait times at checkpoints.
He explained that the time spent removing and replacing shoes can be cumbersome, especially for those wearing boots or dress shoes. Therefore, keeping shoes on during security screening is expected to expedite the process.
While the convenience of leaving shoes on is welcomed, Price cautioned that security must always remain a priority. Effective security involves finding a balance between efficiency and the protection of passengers.
Price noted that achieving 100 percent security is an unrealistic goal, as doing so would effectively halt air travel. The objective is to enhance the level of detection and deterrence, minimizing the likelihood of incidents at airports.
Price suspects that the absence of recent incidents related to shoe bombs played a role in the decision made by the Department of Homeland Security. He pointed out that most prohibited items are now discovered in travelers’ pockets or backpacks rather than on their feet.
This trend may have influenced this significant policy shift, reflecting a more nuanced understanding of security risks today.
Despite the easing of shoe removal requirements, Price stressed the importance of maintaining random screening procedures. This method of screening is essential for keeping travelers and TSA personnel proactive in their security measures.
He explained that while some may label the previous shoe removal rule as mere