Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A prominent transgender rights activist is calling on the Democratic Party to intensify its advocacy regarding transgender issues, asserting that scientific evidence is in their favor. Charlotte Clymer emphasized the importance of fighting back against anti-trans narratives during a recent appearance on MSNBC’s ‘The Katie Phang Show.’
Clymer, an Army veteran and former press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, stated, ‘It’s very easy to fight back on trans issues.’ She urged Democratic leaders to confront the rising tide of misinformation regarding transgender rights, saying, ‘The science is on our side.’ She highlighted that every major medical organization endorses gender-affirming care and decries the trans military ban as ‘ridiculous and unnecessary.’
Despite the activist’s confidence in the science supporting transgender rights, recent studies present significant challenges. A research article published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine found alarming statistics among individuals who underwent sex change surgeries. Assessments conducted two years post-surgery revealed that these individuals experienced significantly higher rates of depression, anxiety, substance-use disorders, and suicidal tendencies.
According to the study’s findings, men who had sex-change surgery exhibited a depression rate of 25%, compared to 11.5% among those who did not undergo the procedure. Similarly, anxiety rates among men who underwent surgery were reported at 12.8%, juxtaposed with only 2.6% in the non-surgical group. The research also indicated that women undergoing sex-change surgery had depression rates of 22.9%, versus 14.6% in their non-surgical counterparts.
Clymer, who writes for her Substack titled ‘Charlotte’s Web Thoughts,’ focuses on a range of topics, including politics, religion, and culture from the perspective of a Christian transgender woman. In her discussion, Clymer expressed disappointment at what she perceives as a lack of proactive engagement from Democrats regarding transgender rights.
Highlighting the inaction from Democratic leadership, she remarked, ‘I’m not seeing a lot of fight from Democratic leadership in Congress, and that is a huge mistake.’ Clymer added, ‘The problem with this thinking is that we have an open goal. No one’s defending it. Why wouldn’t Republicans keep kicking at that goal?’
Clymer contrasted the Democratic response with the more aggressive stance taken by Republicans, who have incorporated transgender issues into their political campaigns. She pointed out, ‘Only one party is really talking about trans issues. It’s the Republican Party. They’ve made trans issues one of their central topics in campaigning and the national discourse.’
Phang, the show host, echoed Clymer’s observations, commenting on the tactics utilized by Republicans. ‘They love to fearmonger. That’s their currency,’ Phang explained. ‘It galvanizes people to vote based on fear, not on facts. I always like to say, don’t vote on feelings, vote on facts.’
Clymer articulated her concerns regarding the future of the Democratic Party if they do not improve their messaging around transgender rights. She cautioned, ‘The more the Democrats ignore this, the more it’s going to come back to haunt us in future elections.’ Her comments serve as a wake-up call for Democratic leaders to recognize the increasing prominence of trans issues in the political landscape.
Furthermore, with voters increasingly aware of the implications surrounding transgender policies, the pressure mounts on the Democratic Party to advocate strongly and effectively for transgender rights. As Clymer pointed out, the organization’s silence on these matters can have dire electoral consequences.
In an ever-evolving political environment, the issue of transgender rights remains a pivotal topic. As activists like Clymer continue to voice their perspectives, the dialogue around these important issues will likely shape the future strategies of both major political parties.
Understanding the complexities of transgender issues is essential for both political parties. As scientific research evolves and further studies emerge, the conversations surrounding gender-affirming care and transgender rights should take into account both the medical data and personal narratives of those affected. Clymer is clear about the need for a stronger, more unified message from Democrats to counterbalance the narrative presented by Republicans.
Ultimately, Clymer’s appeal for the Democratic Party to embrace the science backing transgender rights urges reflection and action. By engaging more directly with trans issues, Democrats can work to create a more inclusive dialogue that resonates with an increasingly diverse electorate.